Nicholas Wade

7.5k citations
458 papers · 4.4k · h-index 31

Impact in

Papers in

Nicholas Wade

391 papers receiving 3.9k citations

Peers

Nicholas Wade
Comparison fields: 5 of 199
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 2.1k
  • History and Philosophy of Science 223
  • Human-Computer Interaction 256
  • General Psychology 50
  • Ophthalmology 304
Replace Richard L Gregory with:
Richard L Gregory United Kingdom
John Miles Foley United States
Elwin Marg United States
William Epstein United States
Edwin G. Boring United States
D. M. MACKAY United Kingdom
Michael McCloskey United States
James M. Clark United States
Michael Smith United Kingdom
Dennis K. Pearl United States
Nicholas Wade relative to Richard L Gregory United Kingdom Richard L Gregory's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Richard L Gregory · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nicholas Wade

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nicholas Wade's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nicholas Wade with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nicholas Wade more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nicholas Wade

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nicholas Wade. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nicholas Wade. The network helps show where Nicholas Wade may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nicholas Wade, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nicholas Wade Line = papers co-authored together Nicholas Wade links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 458 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1982192
2 2010176
3
A natural history of vision
1998107
4 200595
5 197879
6 199468
7 197665
8 200159
9 197055
10 197554
11 197650
12 201050
13 198449
14 196849
15 198748
16 200148
17 196948
18 197447
19 199246
20 198746

About Nicholas Wade

Nicholas Wade is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Reproductive Medicine, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, History and Philosophy of Science and History, having authored 458 papers that have together received 4.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Visual perception and processing mechanisms (93 papers), Science, Research, and Medicine (28 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (21 papers), History of Medicine Studies (20 papers), Neurology and Historical Studies (20 papers), Biotechnology and Related Fields (17 papers), Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (15 papers) and Spatial Cognition and Navigation (14 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (2.1k citations), History and Philosophy of Science (223 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (256 citations), General Psychology (50 citations) and Ophthalmology (304 citations). Nicholas Wade has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Michael T Swanston, Benjamin W. Tatler, R. H. Day, William J. Broad, H. L. Armstrong, Charles M. M. de Weert, Peter Wenderoth, Hiroshi Ono, Stanley Finger and Boris M. Velichkovsky. Their work appears in journals such as Science, Perception, Journal of the History of the Neurosciences, Vision Research and Psychological Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact