David Van Lear
Impact in
-
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
- Forest ecology and management
- Seedling growth and survival studies
- Global and Planetary Change top 5%
- Fire effects on ecosystems
Papers in
-
- Fire effects on ecosystems 8
- Forest Management and Policy 1
-
- Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies 6
- Co-authors
- Patrick H. Brose (10 shared papers)Thomas M. Schuler (2 shared papers)Leon M. Wilkins (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Forest Ecology and Management (1 paper)Journal of Forestry (1 paper)Southern Journal of Applied Forestry (1 paper)Optics Letters (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
David Van Lear
11 papers receiving 379 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 41
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 359
- Global and Planetary Change 392
- Ecology 240
- Insect Science 56
- Ecological Modeling 16
Countries citing papers authored by David Van Lear
This map shows the geographic impact of David Van Lear's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Van Lear with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Van Lear more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by David Van Lear
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Van Lear. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Van Lear. The network helps show where David Van Lear may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 3 scholars most cited alongside David Van Lear, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2001 | 219 | |
| 2 | 1999 | 142 | |
| 3 | 1999 | 51 | |
| 4 | Survival of Hardwood Regeneration During Prescribed Fires: The Importance of Root Development and Root Collar Location | 2004 | 30 |
| 5 | Enhancing oak regeneration with fire in shelterwood stands: preliminary trials | 1996 | 23 |
| 6 | Bringing Fire Back | 2001 | 6 |
| 7 | Mayapple (Podophyllum peltatum L.) | 1974 | 4 |
| 8 | A Shelterwood-burn Technique for Regenerating Productive Upland Oak Sites | 2000 | 3 |
| 9 | Clemson Researchers Find Prescribed Fire Regenerates Oak Forests | 1999 | 3 |
| 10 | 2004 | 2 | |
| 11 | Effects of seasonal prescribed fires on hardwood advance regeneration in shelterwood stands | 1997 | 2 |
| 12 | 2003 | 0 |
About David Van Lear
David Van Lear is a scholar working on Global and Planetary Change, Insect Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecology and Molecular Biology, having authored 12 papers that have together received 485 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Fire effects on ecosystems (8 papers), Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (6 papers), Seedling growth and survival studies (3 papers), Forest ecology and management (2 papers), Forest Management and Policy (1 paper), American Environmental and Regional History (1 paper), Plant-derived Lignans Synthesis and Bioactivity (1 paper) and Bioenergy crop production and management (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (359 citations), Global and Planetary Change (392 citations), Ecology (240 citations), Insect Science (56 citations) and Ecological Modeling (16 citations). David Van Lear has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Patrick H. Brose, Thomas M. Schuler and Leon M. Wilkins. Their work appears in journals such as Forest Ecology and Management, Journal of Forestry, Southern Journal of Applied Forestry and Optics Letters.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.