Chad Kirschbaum

597 citations
8 papers · 447 · h-index 5

Impact in

Papers in

Chad Kirschbaum

8 papers receiving 424 citations

Peers

Chad Kirschbaum
Comparison fields: 5 of 38
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 335
  • Global and Planetary Change 272
  • Ecology 248
  • Ecological Modeling 35
  • Insect Science 62
Replace Rhett Johnson with:
Rhett Johnson United States
Douglas B. Ransome Canada
Vic Jurskis Australia
Verónica Rusch Argentina
Yann Dumas France
David Van Lear United States
Todd E. Ristau United States
Francis E. Schwab Canada
Jennifer M. Hurst New Zealand
Todd M. Fearer United States
Chad Kirschbaum relative to Rhett Johnson United States Rhett Johnson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Rhett Johnson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Chad Kirschbaum

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Chad Kirschbaum's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chad Kirschbaum with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chad Kirschbaum more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Chad Kirschbaum

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chad Kirschbaum. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chad Kirschbaum. The network helps show where Chad Kirschbaum may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside Chad Kirschbaum, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Chad Kirschbaum Line = papers co-authored together Chad Kirschbaum links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
#Work
1 2017173
2 2010140
3
Plant communities growing on boulders in the Allegheny National Forest: Evidence for boulders as refugia from deer and as a bioassay of overbrowsing
200556
4 200538
5 200335
6 20093
7
Powers Bluff: A Botanically Significant Site in Central Washington
20041
8 20071

About Chad Kirschbaum

Chad Kirschbaum is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecology, Global and Planetary Change, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Plant Science, having authored 8 papers that have together received 447 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (5 papers), Fire effects on ecosystems (4 papers), Rangeland and Wildlife Management (3 papers), Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies (3 papers), Plant and animal studies (2 papers), Lichen and fungal ecology (1 paper), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (1 paper) and Archaeology and Natural History (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (335 citations), Global and Planetary Change (272 citations), Ecology (248 citations), Ecological Modeling (35 citations) and Insect Science (62 citations). Chad Kirschbaum has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Alejandro A. Royo, Walter P. Carson, Rachel J. Collins, Mary Beth Adams, Brian L. Anacker, Joshua A. Banta, Scott E. Nielsen, Anthony W. D’Amato, David L. Peterson and Maria K. Janowiak. Their work appears in journals such as Ecology, Journal of Forestry, Forest Ecology and Management, Natural Areas Journal and SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact