David Semple

1.6k citations
43 papers · 1.1k · h-index 12

Impact in

  • Toxicology top 0.5%
    • Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis
    • Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research

Papers in

David Semple

35 papers receiving 999 citations

Peers

David Semple
Comparison fields: 5 of 104
  • Toxicology 203
  • Pharmacology 325
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 228
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 227
  • Neurology 96
Replace David M. McDowell with:
David M. McDowell United States
T. Acciavatti Italy
Leslie H. Lundahl United States
Rebecca Crean United States
Martin H. Leamon United States
Glenn Dumont Netherlands
Liam J. Nestor United Kingdom
Nitya Jayaram‐Lindström Sweden
Debra Harris United States
Alessandra Paparelli United Kingdom
David Semple relative to David M. McDowell United States David M. McDowell's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
David M. McDowell · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Semple

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Semple's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Semple with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Semple more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Semple

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Semple. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Semple. The network helps show where David Semple may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside David Semple, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Semple Line = papers co-authored together David Semple links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 43 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005324
2 1999228
3 2004104
4 200971
5 200358
6 201342
7 201740
8 201940
9 199330
10 201929
11 200917
12 199911
13
Oxford Handbook of Psychiatry 3rd Ed
201311
14 20248
15 20185
16 20005
17 20204
18 20243
19 20193
20 20083

About David Semple

David Semple is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Pharmacology, Clinical Psychology, Molecular Biology and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 43 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies (7 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (3 papers), Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis (2 papers), Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research (2 papers), Treatment of Major Depression (2 papers), Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare (1 paper), AI in cancer detection (1 paper) and Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Toxicology (203 citations), Pharmacology (325 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (228 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (227 citations) and Neurology (96 citations). David Semple has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Andrew M. McIntosh, Stephen M. Lawrie, Roger Smyth, Klaus P. Ebmeier, Eve C. Johnstone, Michael F. Glabus, Ronan E. O’Carroll, David G. C. Owens, Lesley K. Harrison and A. M. M. Van Erp. Their work appears in journals such as The British Journal of Psychiatry, Journal of Ect, Emergency Medicine Journal, Brain Research and BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact