David Osterbur

17 papers receiving 625 citations

Peers

David Osterbur
Comparison fields: 5 of 112
  • Aging 46
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 78
  • Gender Studies 78
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 138
  • Insect Science 59
Replace Wolfgang Hampe with:
Wolfgang Hampe Germany
Jean‐Jacques Rémy France
Benjamin D. Aronson United States
Samantha C. Lewis United States
Isabelle Gillot France
Melissa Cabecinha United Kingdom
Cheryl L. Marks United States
Sonia Kim United States
Taichi Q. Itoh Japan
Stefanie Seisenberger United Kingdom
David Osterbur relative to Wolfgang Hampe Germany Wolfgang Hampe's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8×9.2×
Wolfgang Hampe · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Osterbur

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Osterbur's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Osterbur with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Osterbur more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Osterbur

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Osterbur. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Osterbur. The network helps show where David Osterbur may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside David Osterbur, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Osterbur Line = papers co-authored together David Osterbur links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 1982153
2 2019141
3 2001103
4 201947
5 198543
6 199634
7 198831
8
Carving a niche: establishing bioinformatics collaborations.
200622
9 201914
10 198213
11 201613
12
Gene differentiation in chromosome races of Anopheles nuneztovari (Gabaldon).
198012
13 197712
14 20175
15 20145
16
Evaluating Terminologies to Enable Imaging-Related Decision Rule Sharing.
20164
17 19891

About David Osterbur

David Osterbur is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Molecular Biology, Genetics, Information Systems and Ecology, having authored 17 papers that have together received 653 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (6 papers), Insect Resistance and Genetics (2 papers), Research Data Management Practices (2 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (2 papers), Physiological and biochemical adaptations (2 papers), Genetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal Abnormalities (1 paper), Circadian rhythm and melatonin (1 paper) and Retinal Diseases and Treatments (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Aging (46 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (78 citations), Gender Studies (78 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (138 citations) and Insect Science (59 citations). David Osterbur has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Hong Kong and Singapore. Frequent co-authors include Mary Alice Yund, James W. Fristrom, Edward M. Berger, Robert C. Ireland, Karl Sirotkin, Yunxia Wang, Pam Megaw, Gianluca Tosini, Chiaki Fukuhara and Joseph C. Besharse. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, Developmental Biology, British Journal of Ophthalmology, Developmental Brain Research and College & Research Libraries.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact