David Nutt

10 papers receiving 519 citations

Peers

David Nutt
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Biological Psychiatry 62
  • Physiology 61
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 36
  • Pharmacology 162
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 159
Replace D.L. Murphy with:
D.L. Murphy United States
Paulo Henrique S. Botton Brazil
Marcelo Silveira da Costa Brazil
Ariandra Guerini Sartim Brazil
Rómeó D. Andó Hungary
Eric B. Thorndike United States
Péter Petschner Hungary
Peter van der Ark Belgium
Bruce I. Diamond United States
Paola Mascia Italy
David Nutt relative to D.L. Murphy United States D.L. Murphy's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×29×
D.L. Murphy · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Nutt

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Nutt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Nutt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Nutt more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Nutt

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Nutt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Nutt. The network helps show where David Nutt may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside David Nutt, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Nutt Line = papers co-authored together David Nutt links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
#Work
1
The role of dopamine and norepinephrine in depression and antidepressant treatment.
2006167
2 2010151
3 2001105
4
Management of patients with depression associated with anxiety symptoms.
199735
5 199432
6 198927
7 198817
8 20024
9 19913
10 20041

About David Nutt

David Nutt is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Neurology and Physiology, having authored 10 papers that have together received 542 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Treatment of Major Depression (4 papers), Adenosine and Purinergic Signaling (2 papers), Epilepsy research and treatment (1 paper), Coffee research and impacts (1 paper), Synthesis of heterocyclic compounds (1 paper), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (1 paper), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (1 paper) and Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (62 citations), Physiology (61 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (36 citations), Pharmacology (162 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (159 citations). David Nutt has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Netherlands and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Richard P. Evershed, Jürgen Deckert, Susan V. Heatherley, Peter J. Rogers, Emma Mullings, Christa Hohoff, Akihisa Kamata, Yuko Kawata, Takuya Murakami and Sunao Kaneko. Their work appears in journals such as The British Journal of Psychiatry, Epilepsy Research, Journal of Neuroscience, Journal of Psychopharmacology and Neuropsychopharmacology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact