David Navas

2.7k citations
65 papers · 2.2k · h-index 28

Impact in

Papers in

David Navas

65 papers receiving 2.2k citations

Peers

David Navas
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 1.3k
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 735
  • Condensed Matter Physics 379
  • Materials Chemistry 1.2k
  • Structural Biology 23
Replace Jochen Barthel with:
Jochen Barthel Germany
Massimiliano Marangolo France
K. Mahalingam United States
A. A. Sirenko United States
Dieter Elefant Germany
Rohit P. Prasankumar United States
Adrián Quesada Spain
Ron Jansen Netherlands
Sergiy Mankovskyy Germany
Y. Samson France
David Navas relative to Jochen Barthel Germany Jochen Barthel's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×4.8×
Jochen Barthel · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Navas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Navas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Navas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Navas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Navas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Navas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Navas. The network helps show where David Navas may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside David Navas, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Navas Line = papers co-authored together David Navas links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 65 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2003435
2 2004123
3 200587
4 200381
5 200776
6 201573
7 200773
8 200473
9 201268
10 200467
11 202056
12 201155
13 200754
14 200752
15 201347
16 201943
17 200838
18 202036
19 201833
20 200731

About David Navas

David Navas is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Materials Chemistry, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Condensed Matter Physics and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 65 papers that have together received 2.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Magnetic properties of thin films (45 papers), Anodic Oxide Films and Nanostructures (37 papers), Nanoporous metals and alloys (17 papers), Magnetic Properties and Applications (12 papers), Theoretical and Computational Physics (8 papers), ZnO doping and properties (8 papers), Characterization and Applications of Magnetic Nanoparticles (7 papers) and Smart Materials for Construction (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (1.3k citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (735 citations), Condensed Matter Physics (379 citations), Materials Chemistry (1.2k citations) and Structural Biology (23 citations). David Navas has collaborated with scholars based in Spain, Portugal and United States. Frequent co-authors include Manuel Vázquez, KLEBER ROBERTO PIROTA, Manuel Hernández-Vélez, Kornelius Nielsch, Juan J. L. Velázquez, Agustina Asenjo, Ralf B. Wehrspohn, U. Gösele, Patricio F. Vargas and Jaime Cartes. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Applied Physics, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, Physica B Condensed Matter, Physical Review B and Nanomaterials.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact