David N. Kramer

2.1k citations
66 papers · 1.8k · h-index 24

Impact in

Papers in

David N. Kramer

62 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

David N. Kramer
Comparison fields: 5 of 122
  • Electrochemistry 152
  • Bioengineering 118
  • Pharmacology 221
  • Spectroscopy 235
  • Analytical Chemistry 127
Replace Boyd Dempsey with:
Boyd Dempsey Australia
G.W.F.H. Borst-Pauwels Netherlands
Kazuo Hirayama Japan
E. P. Serjeant Australia
Halina Y. Neujahr Sweden
Eugene Sawîckî United States
Analytical Methods Committee United Kingdom
A. Townshend United Kingdom
Luis P. Candeias United Kingdom
R. Sömme Norway
David N. Kramer relative to Boyd Dempsey Australia Boyd Dempsey's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.1×
Boyd Dempsey · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David N. Kramer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David N. Kramer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David N. Kramer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David N. Kramer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David N. Kramer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David N. Kramer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David N. Kramer. The network helps show where David N. Kramer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside David N. Kramer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David N. Kramer Line = papers co-authored together David N. Kramer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 66 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1964166
2 1979130
3 196692
4 196786
5 195886
6 196583
7 196581
8 195975
9 196575
10 196273
11 196369
12 200164
13 196560
14 196150
15 196246
16 196545
17 196633
18 197627
19 196427
20 199926

About David N. Kramer

David N. Kramer is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Molecular Biology, Spectroscopy and Pharmacology, having authored 66 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Electrochemical sensors and biosensors (10 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (9 papers), Electrochemical Analysis and Applications (6 papers), Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases (6 papers), Chemical Reaction Mechanisms (5 papers), Synthesis and Reactions of Organic Compounds (4 papers), Analytical Methods in Pharmaceuticals (4 papers) and Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Electrochemistry (152 citations), Bioengineering (118 citations), Pharmacology (221 citations), Spectroscopy (235 citations) and Analytical Chemistry (127 citations). David N. Kramer has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include G. G. Guilbault, George G. Guilbault, G. G. Guilbault, B. Schumacher, Edward J. Poziomek, William A. Mosher, Harry O. Michel, M. Boccadoro, Brown L. Murr and Frank E. Block. Their work appears in journals such as Analytical Chemistry, The Journal of Organic Chemistry, Analytical Biochemistry, The Journal of Physical Chemistry and Microchemical Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact