David N. Kramer

2.1k citations
64 papers · 1.6k · h-index 22

Impact in

Papers in

David N. Kramer

59 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

David N. Kramer
Comparison fields: 5 of 120
  • Electrochemistry 140
  • Bioengineering 106
  • Spectroscopy 216
  • Pharmacology 203
  • Analytical Chemistry 108
Replace Boyd Dempsey with:
Boyd Dempsey Australia
Eugene Sawîckî United States
G.W.F.H. Borst-Pauwels Netherlands
E. P. Serjeant Australia
Analytical Methods Committee
Iqbal Ahmad Pakistan
A. Townshend United Kingdom
Jack Schubert United States
G. G. Guilbault United States
R. Sömme Norway
David N. Kramer relative to Boyd Dempsey Australia Boyd Dempsey's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Boyd Dempsey · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David N. Kramer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David N. Kramer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David N. Kramer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David N. Kramer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David N. Kramer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David N. Kramer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David N. Kramer. The network helps show where David N. Kramer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside David N. Kramer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David N. Kramer Line = papers co-authored together David N. Kramer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 64 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1964150
2 1979113
3 196686
4 196779
5 195875
6 196573
7 195973
8 196365
9 196562
10 196561
11 196257
12 196556
13 200149
14 196143
15 196540
16 196240
17 196628
18 196425
19 197625
20 199924

About David N. Kramer

David N. Kramer is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Molecular Biology, Spectroscopy and Pharmacology, having authored 64 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Electrochemical sensors and biosensors (10 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (9 papers), Electrochemical Analysis and Applications (6 papers), Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases (6 papers), Chemical Reaction Mechanisms (5 papers), Analytical Methods in Pharmaceuticals (4 papers), Synthesis and Reactions of Organic Compounds (4 papers) and Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Electrochemistry (140 citations), Bioengineering (106 citations), Spectroscopy (216 citations), Pharmacology (203 citations) and Analytical Chemistry (108 citations). David N. Kramer has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include G. G. Guilbault, G. G. Guilbault, George G. Guilbault, B. Schumacher, Edward J. Poziomek, William A. Mosher, Harry O. Michel, M. Boccadoro, Brown L. Murr and Ronald H. Levin. Their work appears in journals such as Analytical Chemistry, The Journal of Organic Chemistry, Analytical Biochemistry, Journal of the American Chemical Society and CIRP Annals.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact