David Mott

736 citations
34 papers · 447 · h-index 12

Impact in

    • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
    • Economic and Environmental Valuation
  • Radiation top 10%
    • Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques

Papers in

David Mott

31 papers receiving 442 citations

Peers

David Mott
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Economics and Econometrics 179
  • Radiation 56
  • Otorhinolaryngology 22
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 59
  • General Decision Sciences 5
Replace Shane Hopkins with:
Shane Hopkins United States
Audrey S. Wallace United States
Kai-Ping Liao United States
Suzanne S. S. Mak Hong Kong
Julia J. van Tol‐Geerdink Netherlands
P. Hopwood United Kingdom
Douglas C.A. Taylor United States
Ronald Chen United States
Jill Feldman United States
Adriana Turriziani Italy
David Mott relative to Shane Hopkins United States Shane Hopkins's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.1×
Shane Hopkins · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Mott

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Mott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Mott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Mott more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Mott

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Mott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Mott. The network helps show where David Mott may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside David Mott, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Mott Line = papers co-authored together David Mott links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1998104
2 202149
3 202243
4 202231
5 202224
6 202021
7 198820
8 202220
9 202219
10 201515
11 199714
12 202113
13 20179
14 20229
15 20237
16 20197
17 20226
18 20006
19 20184
20 19924

About David Mott

David Mott is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Biomedical Engineering, General Health Professions and Surgery, having authored 34 papers that have together received 447 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (13 papers), Economic and Environmental Valuation (8 papers), Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging (6 papers), Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (6 papers), Radiation Dose and Imaging (5 papers), Medical Image Segmentation Techniques (2 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (2 papers) and Global Health Care Issues (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Economics and Econometrics (179 citations), Radiation (56 citations), Otorhinolaryngology (22 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (59 citations) and General Decision Sciences (5 citations). David Mott has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Koonal Shah, John Logue, Graham Read, Juan Manuel Ramos-Goñi, Richard Cowan, Oliver Rivero‐Arias, Nancy Devlin, Mehdi Najafzadeh, Tommi Tervonen and Chris Skedgel. Their work appears in journals such as Value in Health, British Journal of Radiology, PharmacoEconomics, International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics and Medical Physics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact