David Loveday
Impact in
-
- Foot and Ankle Surgery
- Tendon Structure and Treatment
- Sports injuries and prevention
-
- Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation
- Hip disorders and treatments
- Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
- Shoulder Injury and Treatment
Papers in
-
- Foot and Ankle Surgery 13
- Tendon Structure and Treatment 7
- Sports injuries and prevention 2
- Surgery 10
- Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation 7
- Co-authors
- A. H. N. Robinson (2 shared papers)R. Clifton (1 shared paper)Naoki Nakano (1 shared paper)Thomas Jones (1 shared paper)Vikas Khanduja (1 shared paper)George Smith (3 shared papers)Adnan A. Faraj (1 shared paper)Constantinos Loizou (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Foot and Ankle Surgery (4 papers)The Bone & Joint Journal (2 papers)Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (1 paper)Clinical Anatomy (1 paper)Clinical Radiology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United Kingdom
In The Last Decade
David Loveday
18 papers receiving 197 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 28
- Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 127
- Surgery 119
- Rheumatology 33
- Rehabilitation 12
- Health Informatics 2
Countries citing papers authored by David Loveday
This map shows the geographic impact of David Loveday's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Loveday with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Loveday more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by David Loveday
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Loveday. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Loveday. The network helps show where David Loveday may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside David Loveday, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2017 | 51 | |
| 2 | 2010 | 34 | |
| 3 | 2011 | 15 | |
| 4 | 2017 | 13 | |
| 5 | 2015 | 12 | |
| 6 | 2009 | 10 | |
| 7 | 2016 | 9 | |
| 8 | 2008 | 8 | |
| 9 | Functional outcome following an ankle or subtalar arthrodesis in adults. | 2014 | 7 |
| 10 | 2010 | 7 | |
| 11 | 2023 | 6 | |
| 12 | 2021 | 5 | |
| 13 | 2013 | 5 | |
| 14 | 2021 | 5 | |
| 15 | 2009 | 4 | |
| 16 | 2021 | 4 | |
| 17 | 2022 | 4 | |
| 18 | 2022 | 1 |
About David Loveday
David Loveday is a scholar working on Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Surgery, Rehabilitation, Epidemiology and Rheumatology, having authored 18 papers that have together received 200 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Foot and Ankle Surgery (13 papers), Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation (7 papers), Tendon Structure and Treatment (7 papers), Musculoskeletal synovial abnormalities and treatments (3 papers), Musculoskeletal Disorders and Rehabilitation (2 papers), Bone fractures and treatments (2 papers), Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management (2 papers) and Sports injuries and prevention (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (127 citations), Surgery (119 citations), Rheumatology (33 citations), Rehabilitation (12 citations) and Health Informatics (2 citations). David Loveday has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include A. H. N. Robinson, R. Clifton, Naoki Nakano, Thomas Jones, Vikas Khanduja, George Smith, Adnan A. Faraj, Constantinos Loizou, Angus Arthur and Alexis Sudlow. Their work appears in journals such as Foot and Ankle Surgery, The Bone & Joint Journal, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Clinical Anatomy and Clinical Radiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.