Andrew Bing
Impact in
-
- Foot and Ankle Surgery
- Tendon Structure and Treatment
Papers in
-
- Foot and Ankle Surgery 8
- Tendon Structure and Treatment 5
- Surgery 5
- Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation 4
- Co-authors
- Shah Jehan (1 shared paper)Andy Goldberg (5 shared papers)David Townshend (4 shared papers)N. Graham (1 shared paper)Graham Cheung (1 shared paper)Michael R. Carmont (1 shared paper)Jan‐Herman Kuiper (1 shared paper)Ian Sharpe (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- The Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery (1 paper)Cells (1 paper)Bone & Joint Open (1 paper)The Bone & Joint Journal (1 paper)Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Andrew Bing
10 papers receiving 159 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 27
- Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 124
- Internal Medicine 11
- Surgery 117
- Biochemistry 14
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 33
Countries citing papers authored by Andrew Bing
This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew Bing's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew Bing with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew Bing more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew Bing
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew Bing. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew Bing. The network helps show where Andrew Bing may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Andrew Bing, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The success of tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis with intramedullary nailing--a systematic review of the literature. | 2011 | 84 |
| 2 | No drain, autologous transfusion drain or suction drain? A randomised prospective study in total hip replacement surgery of 168 patients. | 2010 | 30 |
| 3 | 2021 | 20 | |
| 4 | 2019 | 14 | |
| 5 | 2022 | 6 | |
| 6 | 2021 | 5 | |
| 7 | 2023 | 4 | |
| 8 | 2022 | 4 | |
| 9 | COMPLETE CARTILAGE REGENERATION STEM CELL THERAPY FOR OSTEOCHONDRAL LESIONS OF THE TALUS: EARLY OUTCOMES IN A PILOT STUDY | 2017 | 1 |
| 10 | 2021 | 1 |
About Andrew Bing
Andrew Bing is a scholar working on Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Surgery, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Biomedical Engineering and Rehabilitation, having authored 10 papers that have together received 169 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Foot and Ankle Surgery (8 papers), Tendon Structure and Treatment (5 papers), Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation (4 papers), Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management (2 papers), Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies (2 papers), Bone fractures and treatments (1 paper), Ethics in Clinical Research (1 paper) and Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (124 citations), Internal Medicine (11 citations), Surgery (117 citations), Biochemistry (14 citations) and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (33 citations). Andrew Bing has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Shah Jehan, Andy Goldberg, David Townshend, N. Graham, Graham Cheung, Michael R. Carmont, Jan‐Herman Kuiper, Ian Sharpe, Timothy M. Clough and Jan Herman Kuiper. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery, Cells, Bone & Joint Open, The Bone & Joint Journal and Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.