Daniel T. Watts

30 papers receiving 525 citations

Peers

Daniel T. Watts
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 198
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 30
  • Nephrology 43
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 30
  • Emergency Medicine 54
Replace H. Page Mauck with:
H. Page Mauck United States
W. Raab United States
David Lehr United States
M J Brown United Kingdom
A. Carlsten Sweden
Patricia F. Osgood United States
Anthony D. Jose Australia
James P. Isaacs United States
Paul Godin United States
Patricia E. Arnold United States
Daniel T. Watts relative to H. Page Mauck United States H. Page Mauck's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×
H. Page Mauck · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel T. Watts

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel T. Watts's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel T. Watts with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel T. Watts more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel T. Watts

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel T. Watts. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel T. Watts. The network helps show where Daniel T. Watts may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside Daniel T. Watts, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel T. Watts Line = papers co-authored together Daniel T. Watts links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 196691
2 196071
3 196555
4 196047
5 196445
6 195641
7 202038
8 195931
9 195630
10 196429
11 196321
12 196421
13 195718
14 202215
15 195115
16 19589
17 19628
18 19558
19 19555
20 20214

About Daniel T. Watts

Daniel T. Watts is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Physiology, Small Animals, Surgery and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 33 papers that have together received 625 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Veterinary Pharmacology and Anesthesia (6 papers), Hemoglobin structure and function (4 papers), Adipose Tissue and Metabolism (4 papers), Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control (4 papers), Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (3 papers), Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research (3 papers), Eicosanoids and Hypertension Pharmacology (3 papers) and Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (198 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (30 citations), Nephrology (43 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (30 citations) and Emergency Medicine (54 citations). Daniel T. Watts has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Robert L. Robinson, William H. Cline, M J Peach, Thomas C. Westfall, Thomas D. Darby, T. C. Westfall, Irene Katharina Sigmund, Martin McNally, Maria Dudareva and Mario Morgenstern. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Physiology-Legacy Content, Experimental Biology and Medicine, Journal of Applied Physiology, Anesthesiology and Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact