Daniel T. Watts

30 papers receiving 528 citations

Peers

Daniel T. Watts
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 192
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 29
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 30
  • Nephrology 42
  • Emergency Medicine 48
Replace W. Raab with:
W. Raab United States
H. Page Mauck United States
David Lehr United States
M J Brown United Kingdom
A. Carlsten Sweden
J.Alan Herd United States
Patricia E. Arnold United States
Patricia F. Osgood United States
James P. Isaacs United States
Johnson Ja United States
Daniel T. Watts relative to W. Raab United States W. Raab's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×21×
W. Raab · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel T. Watts

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel T. Watts's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel T. Watts with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel T. Watts more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel T. Watts

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel T. Watts. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel T. Watts. The network helps show where Daniel T. Watts may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside Daniel T. Watts, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel T. Watts Line = papers co-authored together Daniel T. Watts links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 196691
2 196071
3 196555
4 196047
5 196445
6 195641
7 202039
8 195931
9 195630
10 196429
11 196421
12 196321
13 195718
14 202216
15 195115
16 19589
17 19628
18 19558
19 19555
20 20214

About Daniel T. Watts

Daniel T. Watts is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Physiology, Small Animals, Surgery and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 33 papers that have together received 627 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Veterinary Pharmacology and Anesthesia (6 papers), Adipose Tissue and Metabolism (4 papers), Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control (4 papers), Hemoglobin structure and function (4 papers), Pharmacological Effects and Assays (3 papers), Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (3 papers), Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research (3 papers) and Eicosanoids and Hypertension Pharmacology (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (192 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (29 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (30 citations), Nephrology (42 citations) and Emergency Medicine (48 citations). Daniel T. Watts has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Robert L. Robinson, William H. Cline, M J Peach, Thomas C. Westfall, Thomas D. Darby, T. C. Westfall, Nicholas A. Athanasou, Mario Morgenstern, Martin McNally and Irene Katharina Sigmund. Their work appears in journals such as Experimental Biology and Medicine, American Journal of Physiology-Legacy Content, Journal of Applied Physiology, Anesthesiology and Circulation Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact