David Ley

31 papers receiving 656 citations

Peers

David Ley
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
  • Gender Studies 151
  • Urban Studies 92
  • Clinical Psychology 221
  • Demography 117
  • Sociology and Political Science 405
Replace Caitríona Ní Laoire with:
Caitríona Ní Laoire Ireland
Anne‐Marie Fortier United Kingdom
Caroline Knowles United Kingdom
Lucy Mayblin United Kingdom
Sune Qvotrup Jensen Denmark
Derek McGhee United Kingdom
Bridget Byrne United Kingdom
Bülent Diken United Kingdom
Peter Nyers Canada
Frank Mort United Kingdom
David Ley relative to Caitríona Ní Laoire Ireland Caitríona Ní Laoire's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Caitríona Ní Laoire · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Ley

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Ley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Ley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Ley more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Ley

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Ley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Ley. The network helps show where David Ley may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside David Ley, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Ley Line = papers co-authored together David Ley links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2014157
2 2004147
3
Millionaire Migrants: Trans-Pacific Life Lines
2010118
4 199549
5 201336
6 201422
7 201618
8 201617
9 201215
10 201715
11 201815
12
Divisions and Disparities in Lotus-Land: Socio-Spatial Income Polarization in Greater Vancouver, 1970-2005
201214
13
Emerging technologies for learning (volume 2)
200712
14 201211
15 199810
16
World's Fairs and the culture of consumption in the contemporary city.
19929
17 19939
18 20178
19 20138
20 20237

About David Ley

David Ley is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Gender Studies, Social Psychology and General Health Professions, having authored 33 papers that have together received 735 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (9 papers), Gender, Feminism, and Media (5 papers), LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy (3 papers), Rural development and sustainability (2 papers), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (2 papers), Migration, Ethnicity, and Economy (2 papers), Digital Games and Media (2 papers) and Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (151 citations), Urban Studies (92 citations), Clinical Psychology (221 citations), Demography (117 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (405 citations). David Ley has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Malaysia. Frequent co-authors include Nicole Prause, Peter Finn, James S. Duncan, Nachman Ben‐Yehuda, Cathleen E. Willging, Tania Israel, Scott Duncan, Brenna L. Greenfield, Mandy D. Owens and Nicholas Lynch. Their work appears in journals such as Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews, Porn Studies, Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, Canadian Geographies / Géographies canadiennes and Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact