David Lee

32 papers receiving 647 citations

Peers

David Lee
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
  • Urban Studies 244
  • Language and Linguistics 162
  • Literature and Literary Theory 142
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 147
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 38
Replace Dalvir Samra‐Fredericks with:
Dalvir Samra‐Fredericks United Kingdom
Martha Woodmansee United States
Göran Bolin Sweden
Daniel Robichaud Canada
Hugo Letiche Netherlands
Gladys Engel Lang United States
David Grant United Kingdom
Hilde Van den Bulck Belgium
Michael Latham United States
Michael K. Mauws Canada
David Lee relative to Dalvir Samra‐Fredericks United Kingdom Dalvir Samra‐Fredericks's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×20×24.5×
Dalvir Samra‐Fredericks · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Lee

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Lee's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Lee with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Lee more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Lee

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Lee. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Lee. The network helps show where David Lee may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 16 scholars most cited alongside David Lee, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Lee Line = papers co-authored together David Lee links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005207
2
Cognitive Linguistics: An Introduction
200182
3 201174
4 200656
5 201450
6 201549
7 201133
8 201126
9 201026
10 201219
11 201214
12 201813
13
FEE AUDIT SEBAGAI PEMODERASI PENGARUH AUDITOR SWITCHING DAN AUDIT TENURE PADA KUALITAS AUDIT
201712
14 201412
15 201310
16 201210
17 20149
18 20197
19 20146
20 20136

About David Lee

David Lee is a scholar working on Urban Studies, Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, Marketing and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 37 papers that have together received 750 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cultural Industries and Urban Development (21 papers), Political and Economic history of UK and US (4 papers), Copyright and Intellectual Property (3 papers), Cinema and Media Studies (3 papers), Digital Economy and Work Transformation (3 papers), Artistic and Creative Research (3 papers), Gender, Feminism, and Media (3 papers) and Maritime and Coastal Archaeology (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Urban Studies (244 citations), Language and Linguistics (162 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (142 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (147 citations) and Visual Arts and Performing Arts (38 citations). David Lee has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Malaysia. Frequent co-authors include John Swales, Kate Oakley, David Hesmondhalgh, Melissa Nisbett, Mark Uncles, John DiNardo, Richard Naylor, Abigail Gilmore, Giles Moss and Lee Edwards. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Cultural Policy, European Journal of Cultural Studies, Cultural Trends, Television & New Media and Studies in Conservation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact