The Sequence of the Human Genome2001 · 10.0k citations
What are hit papers?
Paper score: A paper's citations measured against the top-1% bar of its own field and year: the square root of citations ÷ bar, so 1 means right at the bar and 2 means four times its citations. The bar blends the citation counts that enter the top 1% of the paper's subfields in its year (weighted 89.5%), of those subfields over all years (0.5%) and of its year across all fields (10%); a subfield and year with fewer than 400 papers takes its year's bar. Papers from 2026 are not scored yet: in an unfinished year, when a paper appeared matters more than how it is cited.
Hit paper: A paper cited at least 1.5× the top-1% bar of its field and year: a paper score of at least √1.5.
This map shows the geographic impact of David L. May's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David L. May with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David L. May more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David L. May. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David L. May. The network helps show where David L. May may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside David L. May, linked wherever they
have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers
they share.
Border = papers with David L. MayLine = papers co-authored togetherDavid L. May links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
Showing the 20 most-cited of 58 papers — load more,
or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.