David L. Gee

35 papers receiving 504 citations

Peers

David L. Gee
Comparison fields: 5 of 107
  • Transplantation 45
  • Animal Science and Zoology 67
  • Biochemistry 36
  • Rehabilitation 33
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 72
Replace James H. McBride with:
James H. McBride United States
John D. Palombo United States
N. Kristiansen Germany
Prakash B Desai India
Francesca Canalías Spain
Jean Marc Lessinger Germany
David Bruch United States
Weijie Zhang China
Staffan Rosenborg Sweden
Cem Aydoğan Türkiye
David L. Gee relative to James H. McBride United States James H. McBride's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6.6×
James H. McBride · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David L. Gee

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David L. Gee's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David L. Gee with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David L. Gee more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David L. Gee

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David L. Gee. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David L. Gee. The network helps show where David L. Gee may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside David L. Gee, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David L. Gee Line = papers co-authored together David L. Gee links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198564
2 198860
3 198155
4 198145
5 199439
6 197838
7 198136
8 198128
9 199727
10 201526
11 201217
12
Two maturation-associated mouse erythrocyte receptors of human B cells. I. Identification of four human B-cell subsets.
198213
13 197812
14 201710
15 197510
16
Case Management System for Coronary Risk Factor Modification following Acute Myocardial Infarction, A
199410
17 198210
18 198110
19 20119
20 19998

About David L. Gee

David L. Gee is a scholar working on Nutrition and Dietetics, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Food Science, Transplantation and Biochemistry, having authored 36 papers that have together received 558 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Food composition and properties (4 papers), Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins (2 papers), Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments (2 papers), Food Chemistry and Fat Analysis (2 papers), Antioxidant Activity and Oxidative Stress (2 papers), Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research (2 papers), Diabetes Management and Research (2 papers) and Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Transplantation (45 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (67 citations), Biochemistry (36 citations), Rehabilitation (33 citations) and Nutrition and Dietetics (72 citations). David L. Gee has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Al L. Tappel, W. Duane Brown, Robert C. Atkins, W. Duane Brown, Jeanne E. Downey, Frederick R. Rickles, Wayne W. Hancock, Philippe de Moerloose, Richard E. Litov and Napier M. Thomson. Their work appears in journals such as Toxicology Letters, Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, Transplantation, Liver Transplantation and Journal of the American College of Nutrition.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact