David Kuai
Impact in
- Ophthalmology top 5%
- Retinal Diseases and Treatments
-
- Retinal Development and Disorders
- CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
- Pluripotent Stem Cells Research
Papers in
-
- Retinal Diseases and Treatments 2
- Retinal and Optic Conditions 1
-
- Retinal Development and Disorders 2
- Co-authors
- David M. Gamm (4 shared papers)Ruchira Singh (4 shared papers)Molly A. Smith (3 shared papers)Lynda S. Wright (2 shared papers)Wei Shen (2 shared papers)M. Joseph Phillips (2 shared papers)Kyle A. Wallace (2 shared papers)Enio T. Perez (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science (2 papers)JAMA Network Open (1 paper)Journal of Biomedical Optics (1 paper)Molecular Therapy (1 paper)Human Molecular Genetics (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesChinaAustralia
In The Last Decade
David Kuai
8 papers receiving 429 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
- Ophthalmology 130
- Molecular Biology 312
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 91
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 78
- Aging 4
Countries citing papers authored by David Kuai
This map shows the geographic impact of David Kuai's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Kuai with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Kuai more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by David Kuai
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Kuai. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Kuai. The network helps show where David Kuai may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside David Kuai, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2012 | 174 | |
| 2 | 2013 | 97 | |
| 3 | 2012 | 75 | |
| 4 | 2015 | 51 | |
| 5 | 2018 | 28 | |
| 6 | 2024 | 4 | |
| 7 | 2024 | 4 | |
| 8 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 9 | 2024 | 0 |
About David Kuai
David Kuai is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Molecular Biology, Nephrology, Pharmacology and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 9 papers that have together received 434 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Retinal Diseases and Treatments (2 papers), Retinal Development and Disorders (2 papers), Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism (1 paper), Optical Coherence Tomography Applications (1 paper), Silk-based biomaterials and applications (1 paper), Retinal and Optic Conditions (1 paper), Fungal Biology and Applications (1 paper) and Gout, Hyperuricemia, Uric Acid (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (130 citations), Molecular Biology (312 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (91 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (78 citations) and Aging (4 citations). David Kuai has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and Australia. Frequent co-authors include David M. Gamm, Ruchira Singh, Molly A. Smith, Lynda S. Wright, Wei Shen, M. Joseph Phillips, Kyle A. Wallace, Enio T. Perez, Jessica Martin and Elizabeth E. Capowski. Their work appears in journals such as Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, JAMA Network Open, Journal of Biomedical Optics, Molecular Therapy and Human Molecular Genetics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.