David Johnson

100 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

David Johnson
Comparison fields: 5 of 188
  • General Psychology 34
  • Geography, Planning and Development 94
  • Computer Networks and Communications 276
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 118
  • Process Chemistry and Technology 22
Replace Thomas J. Smith with:
Thomas J. Smith United States
Chris Park United States
Nick Malleson United Kingdom
Anne Beaulieu Netherlands
Michael P. Johnson United States
Thomas E. Hill United States
Roser Bono Spain
Kim Nimon United States
David Layton United States
T. A. Nosanchuk Canada
David Johnson relative to Thomas J. Smith United States Thomas J. Smith's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×21.2×
Thomas J. Smith · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Johnson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Johnson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Johnson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Johnson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Johnson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Johnson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Johnson. The network helps show where David Johnson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside David Johnson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Johnson Line = papers co-authored together David Johnson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 109 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1998252
2 1997223
3 1980147
4 197497
5 199190
6 201447
7 201447
8 198739
9 201826
10 195724
11 201520
12 199320
13 199419
14 197419
15
Hooked: The Story of the New Zealand Fishing Industry
200418
16
Risk-informed resolution of Generic Safety Issue 191
201317
17 198317
18 201117
19 201416
20 201416

About David Johnson

David Johnson is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Information Systems and Management, Information Systems, Computer Networks and Communications and Cancer Research, having authored 109 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Scientific Computing and Data Management (13 papers), Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks (9 papers), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (7 papers), Mathematical Biology Tumor Growth (5 papers), Airway Management and Intubation Techniques (4 papers), Risk and Safety Analysis (4 papers), Pain Management and Placebo Effect (4 papers) and Distributed and Parallel Computing Systems (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Psychology (34 citations), Geography, Planning and Development (94 citations), Computer Networks and Communications (276 citations), Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (118 citations) and Process Chemistry and Technology (22 citations). David Johnson has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Charles E. Perkins, Edith Turner, Victor Turner, Arlene H. Morgan, Ernest R. Hilgard, Joseph J. Hobbs, John G. Galaty, Peter Lamb, Donald Crummey and Diana N. Johnson. Their work appears in journals such as Clinical Oncology, Child Development, Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d anesthésie, AIChE Journal and Notes and Queries.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact