David Guth

22 papers receiving 663 citations

Peers

David Guth
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Automotive Engineering 290
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 393
  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality 178
  • Human-Computer Interaction 80
  • Transportation 87
Replace Billie Louise Bentzen with:
Billie Louise Bentzen United States
Carryl L. Baldwin United States
John A. Brabyn United States
William R. Wiener United States
Everett W. Hill United States
Neil Lerner United States
Hendrik A. H. C. van Veen Germany
Editha van Loon United Kingdom
Joanne L. Harbluk Canada
Ross H. Day Australia
David Guth relative to Billie Louise Bentzen United States Billie Louise Bentzen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Billie Louise Bentzen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Guth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Guth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Guth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Guth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Guth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Guth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Guth. The network helps show where David Guth may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 23 scholars most cited alongside David Guth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Guth Line = papers co-authored together David Guth links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1986247
2 200581
3 200578
4 198271
5 199542
6 199841
7 198935
8 199433
9 201119
10 201117
11 201116
12 200515
13 199014
14 201212
15 20059
16 20078
17 20137
18 20176
19 20194
20 20144

About David Guth

David Guth is a scholar working on Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, Social Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Automotive Engineering and Speech and Hearing, having authored 22 papers that have together received 762 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Traffic and Road Safety (13 papers), Safety Warnings and Signage (11 papers), Tactile and Sensory Interactions (7 papers), Spatial Cognition and Navigation (4 papers), Evacuation and Crowd Dynamics (3 papers), Urban Transport and Accessibility (3 papers), Noise Effects and Management (3 papers) and Human-Automation Interaction and Safety (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Automotive Engineering (290 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (393 citations), Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality (178 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (80 citations) and Transportation (87 citations). David Guth has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include John J. Rieser, Everett W. Hill, Richard Long, Daniel H. Ashmead, Paul E. Ponchillia, Robert S. Wall, Janet M. Barlow, Billie Louise Bentzen, Christopher Michael Cunningham and Kiara A. Ebinger. Their work appears in journals such as Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Perception, Peabody Journal of Education, Journal of Transportation Engineering and Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact