David Ginat

1.2k citations
112 papers · 961 · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

David Ginat

87 papers receiving 785 citations

Peers

David Ginat
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
  • Computer Science Applications 786
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 363
  • Software 81
  • Media Technology 126
  • Information Systems 241
Replace Bruria Haberman with:
Bruria Haberman Israel
Orni Meerbaum–Salant Israel
Niko Myller Finland
John T. Korb United States
Dennis Bouvier United States
Erik Barendsen Netherlands
Mark Stehlik United States
Richard E. Pattis United States
Tadeusz Wilusz Poland
Jeffrey Bonar United States
David Ginat relative to Bruria Haberman Israel Bruria Haberman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Bruria Haberman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Ginat

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Ginat's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Ginat with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Ginat more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Ginat

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Ginat. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Ginat. The network helps show where David Ginat may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 23 scholars most cited alongside David Ginat, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Ginat Line = papers co-authored together David Ginat links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 112 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007100
2 201554
3 201751
4 199948
5 200441
6 201233
7 200332
8 200827
9 200125
10 199724
11 200723
12 200120
13 198918
14 200718
15 200118
16 200416
17 199616
18 200516
19 200916
20 201315

About David Ginat

David Ginat is a scholar working on Computer Science Applications, Artificial Intelligence, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Computational Theory and Mathematics and Information Systems, having authored 112 papers that have together received 961 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Teaching and Learning Programming (64 papers), Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms (25 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (20 papers), Educational Games and Gamification (16 papers), Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning (15 papers), Evolutionary Algorithms and Applications (13 papers), Software Engineering Research (11 papers) and Logic, programming, and type systems (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Science Applications (786 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (363 citations), Software (81 citations), Media Technology (126 citations) and Information Systems (241 citations). David Ginat has collaborated with scholars based in Israel, United States and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Bruria Haberman, Daniel D. Garcia, Michal Armoni, Daniel D. Sleator, Robert E. Tarjan, Orit Hazzan, Vicki L. Almstrum, John Hamer, Bill Marion and Doug Baldwin. Their work appears in journals such as Computer Science Education, Informatics in Education, Lecture notes in computer science, ACM Inroads and International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact