David Ginat

84 papers receiving 755 citations

Peers

David Ginat
Comparison fields: 5 of 42
  • Computer Science Applications 726
  • Library and Information Sciences 37
  • Architecture 16
  • Education 103
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 42
Replace Ursula Wolz with:
Ursula Wolz United States
Ian Utting United Kingdom
Sue Fitzgerald United States
Diana Cukierman Canada
Donald D. Chinn United States
Elizabeth S. Adams United States
Tuukka Ahoniemi Finland
Essi Lahtinen Finland
Errol Thompson New Zealand
Lori Carter United States
David Ginat relative to Ursula Wolz United States Ursula Wolz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×5.3×
Ursula Wolz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Ginat

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Ginat's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Ginat with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Ginat more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Ginat

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Ginat. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Ginat. The network helps show where David Ginat may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside David Ginat, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Ginat Line = papers co-authored together David Ginat links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 109 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200799
2 201553
3 201752
4 199947
5 200444
6 201232
7 200331
8 200827
9 199725
10 200723
11 200121
12 200119
13 200118
14 200718
15 198917
16 200917
17 199616
18 200415
19 200515
20 201315

About David Ginat

David Ginat is a scholar working on Computer Science Applications, Modeling and Simulation, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Theoretical Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 109 papers that have together received 937 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Teaching and Learning Programming (93 papers), Educational Games and Gamification (8 papers), Mathematical and Computational Methods (4 papers), Complexity and Algorithms in Graphs (4 papers), Logic, programming, and type systems (4 papers), Mathematics Education and Pedagogy (3 papers), History and Theory of Mathematics (3 papers) and Innovative Teaching Methodologies in Social Sciences (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Science Applications (726 citations), Library and Information Sciences (37 citations), Architecture (16 citations), Education (103 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (42 citations). David Ginat has collaborated with scholars based in Israel, United States and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Bruria Haberman, Daniel D. Garcia, Michal Armoni, Robert Endre Tarjan, Daniel D. Sleator, John Hamer, Charles P. Riedesel, Noa Ragonis, Owen L. Astrachan and Vicki L. Almstrum. Their work appears in journals such as Computer Science Education, Informatics in Education, Lecture notes in computer science, ACM Inroads and International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact