David Gaudout

720 citations
32 papers · 512 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

David Gaudout

28 papers receiving 506 citations

Peers

David Gaudout
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
  • Biological Psychiatry 37
  • Biochemistry 82
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 54
  • Neurology 52
  • Physiology 105
Replace Chung‐Kil Won with:
Chung‐Kil Won South Korea
Jehun Choi South Korea
Tae Ju Park South Korea
Usman Ali China
Gerusa Duarte Dalmolin Brazil
Laura Xicota Spain
Sung-Jun Kim South Korea
Donghyuck Bae South Korea
Mine Sibel Gurun Türkiye
Atsushi Sawamoto Japan
David Gaudout relative to Chung‐Kil Won South Korea Chung‐Kil Won's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.7×
Chung‐Kil Won · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Gaudout

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Gaudout's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Gaudout with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Gaudout more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Gaudout

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Gaudout. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Gaudout. The network helps show where David Gaudout may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside David Gaudout, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Gaudout Line = papers co-authored together David Gaudout links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201886
2 201870
3 201859
4 202138
5 201637
6 202127
7 202324
8 202221
9 202419
10 201619
11 202219
12 202114
13 201613
14 201512
15 202411
16 20239
17 20236
18 20235
19 20235
20 20244

About David Gaudout

David Gaudout is a scholar working on Oncology, Molecular Biology, Physiology, Neurology and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, having authored 32 papers that have together received 512 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Saffron Plant Research Studies (12 papers), Medicinal Plants and Bioactive Compounds (4 papers), Neurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (3 papers), Circadian rhythm and melatonin (3 papers), Diet and metabolism studies (3 papers), Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities (2 papers), Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (2 papers) and Nutritional Studies and Diet (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (37 citations), Biochemistry (82 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (54 citations), Neurology (52 citations) and Physiology (105 citations). David Gaudout has collaborated with scholars based in France, United Kingdom and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Julien Bensalem, Line Pourtau, Sophie Layé, Véronique Pallet, Lucile Capuron, Yves Desjardins, Stéphanie Dudonné, Camille Pouchieu, Pauline Lafenêtre and David Vauzour. Their work appears in journals such as Nutrients, Food & Function, Gut Microbes, Pharmaceutics and Frontiers in Nutrition.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact