David Forner
Impact in
- Otorhinolaryngology top 5%
- Head and Neck Cancer Studies
- Health Informatics top 10%
Papers in
- Surgery 13
- Salivary Gland Tumors Diagnosis and Treatment 5
-
- Head and Neck Cancer Studies 12
- Co-authors
- Christopher W. Noel (29 shared papers)Jonathan Trites (16 shared papers)Matthew H. Rigby (21 shared papers)Antoine Eskander (16 shared papers)S. Mark Taylor (15 shared papers)Martin Corsten (13 shared papers)David P. Goldstein (12 shared papers)Natalie G. Coburn (8 shared papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery (10 papers)Otolaryngology (8 papers)The Laryngoscope (5 papers)JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery (5 papers)Oral Oncology (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited StatesNetherlands
In The Last Decade
David Forner
51 papers receiving 586 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
- Otorhinolaryngology 98
- Health Informatics 11
- Oncology 110
- Surgery 176
- Transplantation 9
Countries citing papers authored by David Forner
This map shows the geographic impact of David Forner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Forner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Forner more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by David Forner
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Forner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Forner. The network helps show where David Forner may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside David Forner, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 57 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2016 | 60 | |
| 2 | 2020 | 37 | |
| 3 | 2021 | 29 | |
| 4 | 2018 | 27 | |
| 5 | 2020 | 26 | |
| 6 | 2021 | 26 | |
| 7 | 2021 | 22 | |
| 8 | 2021 | 18 | |
| 9 | 2020 | 18 | |
| 10 | 2020 | 17 | |
| 11 | 2020 | 17 | |
| 12 | 2022 | 16 | |
| 13 | 2018 | 15 | |
| 14 | 2021 | 15 | |
| 15 | 2022 | 14 | |
| 16 | 2017 | 14 | |
| 17 | 2020 | 13 | |
| 18 | 2021 | 12 | |
| 19 | 2021 | 12 | |
| 20 | 2020 | 11 |
About David Forner
David Forner is a scholar working on Surgery, Otorhinolaryngology, Oncology, General Health Professions and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 57 papers that have together received 588 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Head and Neck Cancer Studies (12 papers), Salivary Gland Tumors Diagnosis and Treatment (5 papers), Cancer survivorship and care (5 papers), Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (5 papers), Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (2 papers), Otolaryngology and Infectious Diseases (2 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (2 papers) and Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Otorhinolaryngology (98 citations), Health Informatics (11 citations), Oncology (110 citations), Surgery (176 citations) and Transplantation (9 citations). David Forner has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Christopher W. Noel, Jonathan Trites, Matthew H. Rigby, Antoine Eskander, S. Mark Taylor, Martin Corsten, David P. Goldstein, Natalie G. Coburn, Julie Hallet and T. Phillips. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Otolaryngology, The Laryngoscope, JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery and Oral Oncology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.