David Ford

46 papers receiving 534 citations

Peers

David Ford
Comparison fields: 5 of 116
  • Geometry and Topology 107
  • Algebra and Number Theory 46
  • Hematology 65
  • Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics 19
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 80
Replace Li Su with:
Li Su United Kingdom
Deepak Parashar United Kingdom
Susan Montgomery United States
E. Wattel Netherlands
Aimin Zhao China
John Corcoran United Kingdom
Paul Silcocks United Kingdom
Justin Kim United States
Nataša Kejžar Slovenia
David Ford relative to Li Su United Kingdom Li Su's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.2×
Li Su · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Ford

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Ford's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Ford with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Ford more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Ford

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Ford. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Ford. The network helps show where David Ford may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside David Ford, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Ford Line = papers co-authored together David Ford links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 47 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199358
2 200558
3 198557
4 201052
5 201548
6 201529
7
On the computation of the maximal order in a Dedekind domain /
197824
8 199423
9 198919
10 198718
11 200216
12 199316
13 200916
14 201916
15
Immunomagnetic bone marrow purging of common acute lymphoblastic leukemia cells: suitability of BioMag particles.
199116
16 198513
17 199412
18
Changing fertility patterns, 1974 to 1994.
199611
19 202010
20 20208

About David Ford

David Ford is a scholar working on Surgery, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Geometry and Topology, Algebra and Number Theory and Oncology, having authored 47 papers that have together received 598 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory (7 papers), Polynomial and algebraic computation (6 papers), Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (5 papers), Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology (5 papers), Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation (4 papers), Analytic Number Theory Research (4 papers), Commutative Algebra and Its Applications (3 papers) and Coding theory and cryptography (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geometry and Topology (107 citations), Algebra and Number Theory (46 citations), Hematology (65 citations), Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics (19 citations) and Computational Theory and Mathematics (80 citations). David Ford has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Paul Cool, P. Raj, Johannes Buchmann, D. Chas Mangham, G.L. Cribb, Jeremy Gregory, Marcus R. Vowels, John McKay, Vasili Berdoukas and Michael Pohst. Their work appears in journals such as Experimental Mathematics, The Medical Journal of Australia, Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, Mathematics of Computation and Action Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact