David Ford

52 papers receiving 606 citations

Peers

David Ford
Comparison fields: 5 of 123
  • Geometry and Topology 142
  • Algebra and Number Theory 58
  • Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics 27
  • Hematology 69
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 113
Replace Julia Hartmann with:
Julia Hartmann Germany
Robert B. Brown United States
Carlos Álvarez-Fernández Spain
Li Su United Kingdom
Deepak Parashar United Kingdom
Susan Montgomery United States
E. Wattel Netherlands
Ioannis Athanasopoulos Greece
Aimin Zhao China
John Corcoran United Kingdom
David Ford relative to Julia Hartmann Germany Julia Hartmann's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×4.6×
Julia Hartmann · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Ford

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Ford's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Ford with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Ford more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Ford

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Ford. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Ford. The network helps show where David Ford may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside David Ford, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Ford Line = papers co-authored together David Ford links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 54 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199366
2 198563
3 200560
4 201555
5 201054
6 201530
7
On the computation of the maximal order in a Dedekind domain /
197828
8 199428
9 198923
10 200219
11 199319
12 198719
13 200917
14 201916
15
Immunomagnetic bone marrow purging of common acute lymphoblastic leukemia cells: suitability of BioMag particles.
199116
16 199415
17 198514
18
Changing fertility patterns, 1974 to 1994.
199612
19 202010
20 198910

About David Ford

David Ford is a scholar working on Computational Theory and Mathematics, Geometry and Topology, Surgery, Algebra and Number Theory and Oncology, having authored 54 papers that have together received 691 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory (9 papers), Polynomial and algebraic computation (8 papers), Coding theory and cryptography (6 papers), Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (5 papers), Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology (5 papers), Commutative Algebra and Its Applications (4 papers), Advanced Algebra and Geometry (4 papers) and Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geometry and Topology (142 citations), Algebra and Number Theory (58 citations), Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics (27 citations), Hematology (69 citations) and Computational Theory and Mathematics (113 citations). David Ford has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Paul Cool, P. Raj, Johannes Buchmann, John McKay, D. Chas Mangham, G.L. Cribb, Jeremy Gregory, Marcus R. Vowels, Michael Pohst and Vasili Berdoukas. Their work appears in journals such as Experimental Mathematics, The Medical Journal of Australia, Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, Mathematics of Computation and Action Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact