David Ehrlich

2.2k citations
58 papers · 1.7k · h-index 25

Impact in

Papers in

David Ehrlich

58 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

David Ehrlich
Comparison fields: 5 of 115
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 156
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 647
  • Developmental Neuroscience 122
  • Developmental Biology 53
  • Ophthalmology 177
Replace James V. Corwin with:
James V. Corwin United States
Cristovam Wanderley Picanço Diniz Brazil
Joyce Keifer United States
George D. Mower United States
Golda Anne Kevetter United States
E. Hazel Murphy United States
Lois Winsky United States
Cheryl A. Kitt United States
Stewart Hendry United States
Kazuo Funabiki Japan
David Ehrlich relative to James V. Corwin United States James V. Corwin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
James V. Corwin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Ehrlich

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Ehrlich's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Ehrlich with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Ehrlich more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Ehrlich

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Ehrlich. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Ehrlich. The network helps show where David Ehrlich may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside David Ehrlich, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Ehrlich Line = papers co-authored together David Ehrlich links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 58 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1981201
2 1984105
3 198794
4 201382
5 198772
6 198370
7 198069
8 201268
9 201365
10 201754
11 198453
12 201552
13 201943
14 198543
15 201542
16 201541
17 199239
18 201239
19 195137
20 201435

About David Ehrlich

David Ehrlich is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cognitive Neuroscience, Ophthalmology and Cell Biology, having authored 58 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Retinal Development and Disorders (25 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (18 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (8 papers), Animal Nutrition and Physiology (7 papers), Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (6 papers), Hemispheric Asymmetry in Neuroscience (6 papers), Zebrafish Biomedical Research Applications (5 papers) and Memory and Neural Mechanisms (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Behavioral Neuroscience (156 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (647 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (122 citations), Developmental Biology (53 citations) and Ophthalmology (177 citations). David Ehrlich has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Richard F. Mark, Donald G. Rainnie, Steven J. Ryan, Ian G. Morgan, David Schoppik, Lesley J. Rogers, Kent T. Keyser, Harvey J. Karten, Sheena A. Josselyn and Paul Haber. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Comparative Neurology, Cell and Tissue Research, Developmental Brain Research, Current Biology and Brain Structure and Function.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact