David Eelbode

884 citations
70 papers · 588 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

David Eelbode

58 papers receiving 570 citations

Peers

David Eelbode
Comparison fields: 5 of 21
  • Applied Mathematics 566
  • Algebra and Number Theory 162
  • Mathematical Physics 97
  • Geometry and Topology 59
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 51
Replace Orr Moshe Shalit with:
Orr Moshe Shalit Israel
Alvaro Arias United States
Esteban Andruchow Argentina
Jacques Helmstetter France
André Unterberger France
Kenrô Furutani Japan
Daniel Beltiţă Romania
Thierry Fack France
N E Wegge-Olsen
Juan B. Gil United States
David Eelbode relative to Orr Moshe Shalit Israel Orr Moshe Shalit's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Orr Moshe Shalit · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Eelbode

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Eelbode's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Eelbode with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Eelbode more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Eelbode

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Eelbode. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Eelbode. The network helps show where David Eelbode may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside David Eelbode, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Eelbode Line = papers co-authored together David Eelbode links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 70 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200781
2 200774
3 201041
4 200932
5 200628
6 200721
7 201016
8 201115
9 200815
10 200614
11 201013
12 201013
13 200813
14 201213
15 200712
16 201412
17 200610
18 200810
19 20139
20 20109

About David Eelbode

David Eelbode is a scholar working on Applied Mathematics, Algebra and Number Theory, Mathematical Physics, Geometry and Topology and Computational Theory and Mathematics, having authored 70 papers that have together received 588 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Algebraic and Geometric Analysis (67 papers), Mathematical Analysis and Transform Methods (32 papers), Holomorphic and Operator Theory (29 papers), Advanced Topics in Algebra (24 papers), Matrix Theory and Algorithms (7 papers), Advanced Algebra and Geometry (6 papers), Quantum Mechanics and Non-Hermitian Physics (5 papers) and Spectral Theory in Mathematical Physics (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Mathematics (566 citations), Algebra and Number Theory (162 citations), Mathematical Physics (97 citations), Geometry and Topology (59 citations) and Computational Theory and Mathematics (51 citations). David Eelbode has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, Czechia and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Fred F. Brackx, Hennie De Schepper, Vladimı́r Souček, Franciscus C. Sommen, Jarolím Bureš, Frank C Sommen, Irene Sabadini, Hendrik De Bie, P. Van Lancker and Roman Lávička. Their work appears in journals such as Mathematical Methods in the Applied Sciences, Annals of Global Analysis and Geometry, Mathematische Zeitschrift, Experimental Mathematics and Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact