David E. Lincoln

61 papers receiving 2.5k citations

Peers

David E. Lincoln
Comparison fields: 5 of 105
  • Insect Science 494
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 765
  • Plant Science 1.4k
  • Cell Biology 415
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 306
Replace Ian E. Woodrow with:
Ian E. Woodrow Australia
Rüdiger Hampp Germany
W. A. Thompson United Kingdom
Michael E. Salvucci United States
Yiannis Manetas Greece
S. Aubert France
Hubert Ziegler Germany
Steven J. Crafts‐Brandner United States
Marco Michelozzi Italy
Christa Critchley Australia
David E. Lincoln relative to Ian E. Woodrow Australia Ian E. Woodrow's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.2×
Ian E. Woodrow · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David E. Lincoln

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David E. Lincoln's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David E. Lincoln with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David E. Lincoln more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David E. Lincoln

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David E. Lincoln. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David E. Lincoln. The network helps show where David E. Lincoln may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside David E. Lincoln, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David E. Lincoln Line = papers co-authored together David E. Lincoln links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 61 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1993241
2 2007221
3 1996101
4 199198
5 200095
6 199980
7 201079
8 198478
9 200974
10 198767
11 200664
12 199363
13 200361
14 198561
15 200060
16 199460
17 199856
18 200150
19 199750
20 197845

About David E. Lincoln

David E. Lincoln is a scholar working on Plant Science, Molecular Biology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Global and Planetary Change and Food Science, having authored 61 papers that have together received 2.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant and animal studies (17 papers), Plant biochemistry and biosynthesis (12 papers), Plant responses to elevated CO2 (11 papers), Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols (7 papers), Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (7 papers), Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity (6 papers), Marine Biology and Ecology Research (5 papers) and Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (494 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (765 citations), Plant Science (1.4k citations), Cell Biology (415 citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (306 citations). David E. Lincoln has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include Sarah A. Woodin, Robert H. Johnson, Jean H. Langenheim, Charles A. Mihaliak, Kaiping Han, Eric D. Fajer, R. S. Williams, Michael D. Walla, Richard J. Norby and Merritt J. Murray. Their work appears in journals such as Phytochemistry, Oecologia, Journal of Chemical Ecology, Global Change Biology and American Journal of Botany.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact