David E. Cooper

195 papers receiving 2.7k citations

Peers

David E. Cooper
Comparison fields: 5 of 192
  • Philosophy 465
  • Spectroscopy 585
  • Automotive Engineering 251
  • History and Philosophy of Science 101
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 214
Replace M. Mitchell Waldrop with:
M. Mitchell Waldrop United States
Robert Ε. Kohler Germany
Stephen R. Conway United Kingdom
David K. Lewis United States
Joel W. Russell United States
Paul S. Gray United Kingdom
Norman Brown United States
Philip Ball United Kingdom
Cyril Stanley Smith United States
Pablo Jensen France
David E. Cooper relative to M. Mitchell Waldrop United States M. Mitchell Waldrop's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×27.9×
M. Mitchell Waldrop · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David E. Cooper

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David E. Cooper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David E. Cooper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David E. Cooper more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David E. Cooper

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David E. Cooper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David E. Cooper. The network helps show where David E. Cooper may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside David E. Cooper, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David E. Cooper Line = papers co-authored together David E. Cooper links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 226 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2001257
2 1987156
3 1993146
4 2012126
5 2013119
6 1987115
7 1987100
8 200265
9 201464
10 198762
11 198960
12 199160
13 198659
14 198651
15 200845
16 198944
17 200442
18 199442
19 198942
20 199041

About David E. Cooper

David E. Cooper is a scholar working on Spectroscopy, Philosophy, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Bioengineering and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 226 papers that have together received 3.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spectroscopy and Laser Applications (29 papers), High voltage insulation and dielectric phenomena (19 papers), Laser Design and Applications (18 papers), Electrostatic Discharge in Electronics (12 papers), Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism (12 papers), Power Transformer Diagnostics and Insulation (10 papers), Semiconductor Lasers and Optical Devices (10 papers) and Analytical Chemistry and Sensors (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (465 citations), Spectroscopy (585 citations), Automotive Engineering (251 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (101 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (214 citations). David E. Cooper has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Clinton B. Carlisle, Russell E. Warren, Gregory J. Gibbons, Elizabeth Fricker, M. W. Hyer, Naheed A. Mufti, WILLIAM HAMMOND WRIGHT, Yung-mae M. Yao, Michael P. Hall and Johannes Hampl. Their work appears in journals such as Applied Optics, Optics Letters, Journal of Philosophy of Education, The Philosophical Quarterly and Journal of Electrostatics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact