Wolfe Mays

3.1k citations
84 papers · 1.7k · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Wolfe Mays

68 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Wolfe Mays
Comparison fields: 5 of 117
  • General Psychology 62
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 397
  • Philosophy 408
  • Theoretical Computer Science 32
  • History and Philosophy of Science 173
Replace Gilbert Ryle with:
Gilbert Ryle United Kingdom
Roland Hall United Kingdom
Philip Paul Wiener United States
Justus Buchler United States
Arthur Coleman Danto United States
Lewis White Beck United States
Immanuel Immanuel
Christian J. W. Kloesel United States
A. M. Halpern
Israel Scheffler United States
Wolfe Mays relative to Gilbert Ryle United Kingdom Gilbert Ryle's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Gilbert Ryle · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Wolfe Mays

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Wolfe Mays's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Wolfe Mays with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wolfe Mays more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Wolfe Mays

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Wolfe Mays. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Wolfe Mays. The network helps show where Wolfe Mays may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 10 scholars most cited alongside Wolfe Mays, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Wolfe Mays Line = papers co-authored together Wolfe Mays links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 84 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1971412
2 1974250
3 1978229
4 1969159
5 196897
6 195276
7 199159
8 197151
9 197748
10 197329
11 197820
12 197118
13 196216
14 197114
15 196111
16 196410
17 19539
18 19628
19
Les Liaisons analytiques et synthétiques dans les comportements du sujet
19748
20
Jevons and logic
19537

About Wolfe Mays

Wolfe Mays is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, History and Philosophy of Science, Philosophy, General Psychology and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, having authored 84 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy (22 papers), Whitehead's Philosophy and Applications (14 papers), Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology (11 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (10 papers), Cybernetics and Technology in Society (7 papers), Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education (7 papers), Philosophy, Science, and History (6 papers) and Philosophy and Historical Thought (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Psychology (62 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (397 citations), Philosophy (408 citations), Theoretical Computer Science (32 citations) and History and Philosophy of Science (173 citations). Wolfe Mays has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Jean Piaget, David E. Cooper, Desmond Paul Henry, Bruce Kuklick, W. E. Kennick, Léo Apostel, Eric Matthews, Evert Willem Beth, C. E. M. Hansel and J. M. Burgers. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology, The Philosophical Quarterly, Philosophy, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science and New Ideas in Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact