David Clinton
Impact in
- Development top 1%
- International Development and Aid
-
- International Relations and Foreign Policy
- Global Peace and Security Dynamics
- European Union Policy and Governance
- Social Policy and Reform Studies
Papers in
-
- Political Theory and Influence 3
- American Constitutional Law and Politics 2
- International Law and Human Rights 1
- Global Peace and Security Dynamics 1
- History 2
- European Political History Analysis 2
- Co-authors
- Takashi Inoguchi (1 shared paper)Michael Cox (1 shared paper)G. John Ikenberry (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of International Political Theory (1 paper)The Washington Quarterly (1 paper)The Public Historian (1 paper)Political Science Quarterly (1 paper)Review of International Studies (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
David Clinton
7 papers receiving 373 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
- Development 160
- Political Science and International Relations 275
- Public Administration 28
- Sociology and Political Science 217
- Strategy and Management 51
Countries citing papers authored by David Clinton
This map shows the geographic impact of David Clinton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Clinton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Clinton more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by David Clinton
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Clinton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Clinton. The network helps show where David Clinton may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 3 scholars most cited alongside David Clinton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2005 | 331 | |
| 2 | 2002 | 76 | |
| 3 | 2003 | 6 | |
| 4 | 1981 | 3 | |
| 5 | 1993 | 2 | |
| 6 | 1988 | 2 | |
| 7 | 2021 | 1 | |
| 8 | 2011 | 1 | |
| 9 | 1993 | 1 | |
| 10 | 2003 | 0 |
About David Clinton
David Clinton is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, History, History and Philosophy of Science, Philosophy and Infectious Diseases, having authored 10 papers that have together received 423 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Political Theory and Influence (3 papers), European Political History Analysis (2 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (2 papers), Medieval Philosophy and Theology (1 paper), International Law and Human Rights (1 paper), Global Peace and Security Dynamics (1 paper), History of Science and Medicine (1 paper) and Theology and Philosophy of Evil (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Development (160 citations), Political Science and International Relations (275 citations), Public Administration (28 citations), Sociology and Political Science (217 citations) and Strategy and Management (51 citations). David Clinton has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Takashi Inoguchi, Michael Cox and G. John Ikenberry. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of International Political Theory, The Washington Quarterly, The Public Historian, Political Science Quarterly and Review of International Studies.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.