Review of International Studies

1.8k papers and 28.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.8k papers published in Review of International Studies in the last decades have received a total of 28.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Review of International Studies usually cover Political Science and International Relations (1.0k papers), Sociology and Political Science (848 papers) and Development (170 papers) specifically the topics of International Relations and Foreign Policy (441 papers), Global Peace and Security Dynamics (315 papers) and Peacebuilding and International Security (232 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Review of International Studies are Alexander Wendt, Roland Paris, David A. Baldwin, İver B. Neumann, Andrew Hurrell, Robert W. Cox, Barry Buzan, Lene Hansen, Anssi Paasi and Bahar Rumelili.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Review of International Studies

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Review of International Studies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Review of International Studies.

Countries where authors publish in Review of International Studies

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Review of International Studies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Review of International Studies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Review of International Studies more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025