Chung‐in Moon

1.2k citations
81 papers · 736 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Chung‐in Moon

68 papers receiving 534 citations

Peers

Chung‐in Moon
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Development 115
  • Political Science and International Relations 503
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 98
  • Cultural Studies 79
  • Public Administration 33
Replace Brantly Womack with:
Brantly Womack United States
Joseph Fewsmith United States
Harry Harding United States
Heather Grabbe United Kingdom
Bryan K. Ritchie United States
Michel Oksenberg United States
Il SaKong
T. J. Pempel United States
Philip Oxhorn Canada
Vivek Chibber United States
Chung‐in Moon relative to Brantly Womack United States Brantly Womack's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.4×
Brantly Womack · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Chung‐in Moon

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Chung‐in Moon's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chung‐in Moon with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chung‐in Moon more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Chung‐in Moon

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chung‐in Moon. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chung‐in Moon. The network helps show where Chung‐in Moon may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside Chung‐in Moon, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Chung‐in Moon Line = papers co-authored together Chung‐in Moon links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 81 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199180
2 199078
3 199474
4 199772
5 198428
6 199828
7 199927
8
Democracy and the Korean Economy
199825
9 200919
10 200318
11 198817
12 200915
13 201015
14
Burdens of the past : Overcoming History, the Politics of Identity and Nationalism in Asia
200712
15 201012
16 200012
17 200311
18 200311
19 201111
20 19929

About Chung‐in Moon

Chung‐in Moon is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, Cultural Studies, Economics and Econometrics and Development, having authored 81 papers that have together received 736 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Korean Peninsula Historical and Political Studies (31 papers), Asian Industrial and Economic Development (18 papers), International Relations and Foreign Policy (12 papers), Nuclear Issues and Defense (7 papers), Social Policy and Reform Studies (5 papers), Defense, Military, and Policy Studies (5 papers), International Development and Aid (5 papers) and Japanese History and Culture (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Development (115 citations), Political Science and International Relations (503 citations), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (98 citations), Cultural Studies (79 citations) and Public Administration (33 citations). Chung‐in Moon has collaborated with scholars based in South Korea, United States and Norway. Frequent co-authors include Stephan Haggard, Jongryn Mo, Byung-Kook Kim, David C. Kang, Edward E. Azar, Sangkeun Lee, Jieun Choi, David I. Steinberg, Peter Hayes and Taehwan Kim. Their work appears in journals such as Pacific Affairs, The Pacific Review, Asian Survey, Foreign Affairs and International Relations of the Asia-Pacific.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact