David Chambers

560 citations
7 papers · 366 · h-index 5

Impact in

Papers in

David Chambers

6 papers receiving 354 citations

Peers

David Chambers
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • General Health Professions 180
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 4
  • Applied Psychology 9
  • Health Informatics 2
  • Economics and Econometrics 42
Replace Jason Chao with:
Jason Chao United States
Renata W. Yen United States
Francine Borduas Canada
Meagan Pilar United States
Emily Moore Australia
Coralie Gandré France
Rosemary Field United States
Elisabet Hafstad Norway
Alison K. Herrmann United States
Stephanie W. Edmonds United States
David Chambers relative to Jason Chao United States Jason Chao's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×11×
Jason Chao · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Chambers

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Chambers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Chambers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Chambers more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Chambers

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Chambers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Chambers. The network helps show where David Chambers may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 21 scholars most cited alongside David Chambers, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Chambers Line = papers co-authored together David Chambers links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

7 of 7 papers shown

About David Chambers

David Chambers is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Oncology, Epidemiology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 7 papers that have together received 366 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Health Policy Implementation Science (3 papers), Healthcare cost, quality, practices (1 paper), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (1 paper), Clinical practice guidelines implementation (1 paper), T-cell and B-cell Immunology (1 paper), Immune Cell Function and Interaction (1 paper), Schizophrenia research and treatment (1 paper) and Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Health Professions (180 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (4 citations), Applied Psychology (9 citations), Health Informatics (2 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (42 citations). David Chambers has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Russell E. Glasgow, Gila Neta, Aline Bözec, Artur Wilhelm, Susan T. Azrin, Gerhard Krönke, Georg Schett, Ricardo Grieshaber‐Bouyer, Fabian Müller and Andréas Mackensen. Their work appears in journals such as Translational Behavioral Medicine, Public Management Review, Cancer Causes & Control, Clinical and Translational Science and Health Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact