The Heythrop Journal

1.1k papers and 1.5k indexed citations

About

The 1.1k papers published in The Heythrop Journal in the last decades have received a total of 1.5k indexed citations. Papers published in The Heythrop Journal usually cover Philosophy (550 papers), Sociology and Political Science (279 papers) and Religious studies (221 papers) specifically the topics of Theology and Philosophy of Evil (199 papers), Medieval Philosophy and Theology (184 papers) and Biblical Studies and Interpretation (166 papers). The most active scholars publishing in The Heythrop Journal are Raymond E. Brown, Daniel A. Helminiak, Richard White, Alan Carter, James Bradley, Victoria S. Harrison, Nick Trakakis, W. J. Mander, Michael A. Knibb and David C. Sim.

In The Last Decade

The Heythrop Journal

514 papers receiving 994 citations

Fields of papers published in The Heythrop Journal

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in The Heythrop Journal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in The Heythrop Journal.

Countries where authors publish in The Heythrop Journal

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in The Heythrop Journal. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in The Heythrop Journal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Heythrop Journal more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026