David Brenner

579 citations
27 papers · 391 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

David Brenner

26 papers receiving 345 citations

Peers

David Brenner
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Internal Medicine 40
  • Political Science and International Relations 177
  • Development 18
  • Sociology and Political Science 190
  • Transplantation 9
Replace Donald W. Sutherland with:
Donald W. Sutherland United States
Antoine Bouvier France
Anga R. Timilsina United States
Miguel Rueda United States
Cláudia Furtado Portugal
Charulata Jindal United States
David Y. Yang United States
Kyle Walker United States
Nicoletta Franco Italy
Robert F. Zimmerman United States
David Brenner relative to Donald W. Sutherland United States Donald W. Sutherland's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×30×36×
Donald W. Sutherland · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Brenner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Brenner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Brenner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Brenner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Brenner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Brenner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Brenner. The network helps show where David Brenner may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside David Brenner, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Brenner Line = papers co-authored together David Brenner links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201950
2 201548
3 199233
4 198926
5 201726
6 198721
7 201721
8 198719
9 202117
10 198917
11
Are Chinese NGOs "Going Out"? The Role of Chinese NGOs and GONGOs in Sino-African Relations
201216
12 198914
13 201912
14 199011
15 20189
16 20229
17 20247
18 19917
19 20197
20 19906

About David Brenner

David Brenner is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Surgery, Infectious Diseases and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 27 papers that have together received 391 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Asian Geopolitics and Ethnography (14 papers), Cambodian History and Society (6 papers), Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies (4 papers), Political Conflict and Governance (4 papers), Global Peace and Security Dynamics (3 papers), Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments (3 papers), Urinary and Genital Oncology Studies (3 papers) and Peacebuilding and International Security (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Internal Medicine (40 citations), Political Science and International Relations (177 citations), Development (18 citations), Sociology and Political Science (190 citations) and Transplantation (9 citations). David Brenner has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Paul F. Schellhammer, Enze Han, Janet L. Scott, Joey P. Granger, Sarah Schulman, Steven M. Schlossberg, Martina Tazzioli, Paul Schellhammer, Boyd H. Winslow and James Shaeffer. Their work appears in journals such as Urology, The Journal of Urology, International Political Sociology, Asian Security and Asian Survey.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact