Asian Security

269 papers and 1.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 269 papers published in Asian Security in the last decades have received a total of 1.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Asian Security usually cover Political Science and International Relations (177 papers), Sociology and Political Science (133 papers) and Transportation (28 papers) specifically the topics of International Relations and Foreign Policy (84 papers), Peacebuilding and International Security (35 papers) and Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East (29 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Asian Security are Marc Lanteigne, Min Ye, See Seng Tan, Alexander R. Arifianto, David Brewster, Alexander Korolev, Manjeet S. Pardesi, Kirsten E. Schulze, Carlyle A. Thayer and Andrew Scobell.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Asian Security

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Asian Security. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Asian Security.

Countries where authors publish in Asian Security

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Asian Security. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Asian Security with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Asian Security more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025