David Bevington

2.5k citations
103 papers · 1.0k · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

David Bevington

63 papers receiving 561 citations

Peers

David Bevington
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
  • Classics 277
  • Literature and Literary Theory 455
  • History 371
  • Music 71
  • Museology 74
Replace Alastair Fowler with:
Alastair Fowler United Kingdom
Jonas A. Barish United States
Pat Rogers United States
Robert D. Hume United States
Felicity Nussbaum United States
Dustin Griffin United States
William J. Bouwsma United States
Jonathan Crewe United States
Paul F. Grendler Canada
David Trotter United Kingdom
David Bevington relative to Alastair Fowler United Kingdom Alastair Fowler's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.5×
Alastair Fowler · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Bevington

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Bevington's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Bevington with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Bevington more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Bevington

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Bevington. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Bevington. The network helps show where David Bevington may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside David Bevington, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Bevington Line = papers co-authored together David Bevington links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 103 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1968119
2 1962115
3 200095
4
Doctor Faustus : A- and B- texts (1604, 1616)
199371
5 196661
6 199654
7 199452
8 199746
9 196845
10
English Renaissance drama : a Norton anthology
200241
11 196441
12 198427
13
The theatrical city : culture, theatre, and politics in London, 1576-1649
199525
14 198423
15 198619
16 199818
17 196917
18 196514
19 199610
20 20119

About David Bevington

David Bevington is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, History, Classics, Anthropology and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 103 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (29 papers), Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (9 papers), Philippine History and Culture (7 papers), Medieval Literature and History (7 papers), Historical Art and Culture Studies (7 papers), Renaissance Literature and Culture (6 papers), Irish and British Studies (4 papers) and Scottish History and National Identity (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Classics (277 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (455 citations), History (371 citations), Music (71 citations) and Museology (74 citations). David Bevington has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Eric Rasmussen, Peter Holbrook, David Norbrook, Richard Dutton, Christopher Marlowe, Richard Strier, Katharine Eisaman Maus, Paul Griffiths, David L. Smith and Lars Engle. Their work appears in journals such as Shakespeare Quarterly, Renaissance Drama, Comparative drama, Modern Philology and Speculum.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact