David Norbrook
Impact in
Papers in
- History 13
- Reformation and Early Modern Christianity 6
- Scottish History and National Identity 5
- Renaissance and Early Modern Studies 2
-
- Literature: history, themes, analysis 3
- Co-authors
- Lucy Hutchinson (2 shared papers)Elizabeth Sauer (1 shared paper)H. R. Woudhuysen (1 shared paper)Peter Holbrook (1 shared paper)David Bevington (1 shared paper)Nigel Smith (1 shared paper)John K. Hale (1 shared paper)Devoney Looser (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The Seventeenth Century (4 papers)The Modern Language Review (3 papers)Notes and Queries (3 papers)English Literary Renaissance (2 papers)Australian Journal of French Studies (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
David Norbrook
22 papers receiving 172 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
- History 120
- Classics 33
- Literature and Literary Theory 95
- Museology 19
- Religious studies 20
Countries citing papers authored by David Norbrook
This map shows the geographic impact of David Norbrook's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Norbrook with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Norbrook more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by David Norbrook
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Norbrook. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Norbrook. The network helps show where David Norbrook may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside David Norbrook, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2002 | 66 | |
| 2 | Order and Disorder | 2001 | 59 |
| 3 | 1998 | 32 | |
| 4 | 1996 | 19 | |
| 5 | 2000 | 19 | |
| 6 | 1997 | 17 | |
| 7 | The Penguin Book of Renaissance Verse: 1509-1659 | 1992 | 12 |
| 8 | 2004 | 12 | |
| 9 | 1996 | 8 | |
| 10 | 2001 | 6 | |
| 11 | The translation of Lucretius | 2012 | 5 |
| 12 | 1986 | 4 | |
| 13 | 1996 | 4 | |
| 14 | 1995 | 4 | |
| 15 | 2001 | 3 | |
| 16 | 2003 | 3 | |
| 17 | 1991 | 3 | |
| 18 | 2003 | 2 | |
| 19 | The Works of Lucy Hutchinson: Volume I: The Translation of Lucretius | 2011 | 2 |
| 20 | 2002 | 2 |
About David Norbrook
David Norbrook is a scholar working on History, Literature and Literary Theory, Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations and History and Philosophy of Science, having authored 28 papers that have together received 288 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (6 papers), Scottish History and National Identity (5 papers), Literature: history, themes, analysis (3 papers), Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis (2 papers), Historical Economic and Social Studies (2 papers), Renaissance and Early Modern Studies (2 papers), Historical Influence and Diplomacy (2 papers) and Historical Art and Culture Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History (120 citations), Classics (33 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (95 citations), Museology (19 citations) and Religious studies (20 citations). David Norbrook has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Lucy Hutchinson, Elizabeth Sauer, H. R. Woudhuysen, Peter Holbrook, David Bevington, Nigel Smith, John K. Hale, Devoney Looser, Titus Lucretius Carus and N. H. Keeble. Their work appears in journals such as The Seventeenth Century, The Modern Language Review, Notes and Queries, English Literary Renaissance and Australian Journal of French Studies.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.