David Ames
Impact in
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 5%
- Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Biological Psychiatry top 10%
- Tryptophan and brain disorders
Papers in
-
- Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research 3
- Bipolar Disorder and Treatment 1
-
- Cognitive Functions and Memory 3
- Co-authors
- John T. O’Brien (2 shared papers)Isaac Schweitzer (2 shared papers)Susy Harrigan (1 shared paper)Patricia Desmond (1 shared paper)Colin L. Masters (4 shared papers)Ralph N. Martins (3 shared papers)Christopher C. Rowe (2 shared papers)Victor L. Villemagne (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Alzheimer s & Dementia (2 papers)The World Journal of Biological Psychiatry (1 paper)Translational Psychiatry (1 paper)The Lancet Neurology (1 paper)Aging & Mental Health (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
David Ames
10 papers receiving 622 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
- Psychiatry and Mental health 273
- Biological Psychiatry 33
- Neurology 64
- Physiology 176
- Cognitive Neuroscience 84
Countries citing papers authored by David Ames
This map shows the geographic impact of David Ames's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Ames with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Ames more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by David Ames
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Ames. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Ames. The network helps show where David Ames may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside David Ames, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1996 | 207 | |
| 2 | 2016 | 158 | |
| 3 | 2012 | 155 | |
| 4 | 2015 | 51 | |
| 5 | 2001 | 42 | |
| 6 | 2016 | 17 | |
| 7 | Minimising psychotropic use for behavioural disturbance in residential aged care. | 2015 | 7 |
| 8 | 2000 | 5 | |
| 9 | 2014 | 2 | |
| 10 | Deficits in learning are greater than memory dysfunction in preclinical Alzheimer’s disease | 2020 | 1 |
About David Ames
David Ames is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Physiology, General Health Professions and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 10 papers that have together received 645 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cognitive Functions and Memory (3 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (3 papers), Nutritional Studies and Diet (1 paper), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (1 paper), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (1 paper), Workplace Violence and Bullying (1 paper), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (1 paper) and Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (273 citations), Biological Psychiatry (33 citations), Neurology (64 citations), Physiology (176 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (84 citations). David Ames has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include John T. O’Brien, Isaac Schweitzer, Susy Harrigan, Patricia Desmond, Colin L. Masters, Ralph N. Martins, Christopher C. Rowe, Victor L. Villemagne, Pierrick Bourgeat and Belinda M. Brown. Their work appears in journals such as Alzheimer s & Dementia, The World Journal of Biological Psychiatry, Translational Psychiatry, The Lancet Neurology and Aging & Mental Health.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.