David Ames
Impact in
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 5%
- Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Biological Psychiatry top 10%
- Tryptophan and brain disorders
Papers in
-
- Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research 5
- Bipolar Disorder and Treatment 1
-
- Functional Brain Connectivity Studies 3
- Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies 1
- Co-authors
- John T. O’Brien (2 shared papers)Isaac Schweitzer (2 shared papers)Patricia Desmond (1 shared paper)Susy Harrigan (1 shared paper)Colin L. Masters (4 shared papers)Ralph N. Martins (3 shared papers)Christopher C. Rowe (2 shared papers)Olivier Salvado (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Alzheimer s & Dementia (2 papers)The Clinical Neuropsychologist (1 paper)Aging & Mental Health (1 paper)Translational Psychiatry (1 paper)The Lancet Neurology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
David Ames
10 papers receiving 581 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
- Psychiatry and Mental health 305
- Biological Psychiatry 39
- Neurology 94
- Physiology 236
- Cognitive Neuroscience 161
Countries citing papers authored by David Ames
This map shows the geographic impact of David Ames's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Ames with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Ames more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by David Ames
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Ames. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Ames. The network helps show where David Ames may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside David Ames, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1996 | 197 | |
| 2 | 2016 | 150 | |
| 3 | 2012 | 129 | |
| 4 | 2015 | 48 | |
| 5 | 2001 | 41 | |
| 6 | 2016 | 17 | |
| 7 | Minimising psychotropic use for behavioural disturbance in residential aged care. | 2015 | 7 |
| 8 | 2000 | 5 | |
| 9 | 2014 | 2 | |
| 10 | Deficits in learning are greater than memory dysfunction in preclinical Alzheimer’s disease | 2020 | 1 |
About David Ames
David Ames is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Cognitive Neuroscience, Physiology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and General Health Professions, having authored 10 papers that have together received 597 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (5 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (3 papers), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (2 papers), Cognitive Functions and Memory (2 papers), Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (1 paper), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (1 paper), Nutritional Studies and Diet (1 paper) and Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (305 citations), Biological Psychiatry (39 citations), Neurology (94 citations), Physiology (236 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (161 citations). David Ames has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include John T. O’Brien, Isaac Schweitzer, Patricia Desmond, Susy Harrigan, Colin L. Masters, Ralph N. Martins, Christopher C. Rowe, Olivier Salvado, Victor L. Villemagne and Vincent Doré. Their work appears in journals such as Alzheimer s & Dementia, The Clinical Neuropsychologist, Aging & Mental Health, Translational Psychiatry and The Lancet Neurology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.