David A. Ford

473 citations
17 papers · 325 · h-index 8

Impact in

  • Health top 2%
    • Intimate Partner and Family Violence
    • Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies

Papers in

David A. Ford

15 papers receiving 278 citations

Peers

David A. Ford
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • Health 212
  • Gender Studies 97
  • Sociology and Political Science 227
  • Conservation 14
  • Clinical Psychology 53
Replace Debra Parkinson with:
Debra Parkinson Australia
Evangelia Tastsoglou Canada
Holly Johnson Canada
Martha R. Mahoney United States
Esther Arenas-Arroyo United States
Susan Edwards United Kingdom
Barbara J. MacQuarrie Canada
Elli Nur Hayati Indonesia
Radha Iyengar United States
Jordan R. Riddell United States
David A. Ford relative to Debra Parkinson Australia Debra Parkinson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
Debra Parkinson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David A. Ford

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David A. Ford's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David A. Ford with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David A. Ford more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David A. Ford

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David A. Ford. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David A. Ford. The network helps show where David A. Ford may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside David A. Ford, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David A. Ford Line = papers co-authored together David A. Ford links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 1991135
2 198367
3 200341
4 197525
5 199415
6 201010
7 20189
8 20188
9 20095
10 20204
11 20032
12 20221
13
Cambodian Student Competencies in Chemistry at Lower Secondary School Compared to regional neighbors and Japan
20151
14 20131
15
The politics of domain consensus: applications to long-term care.
19871
16 19990
17 19880

About David A. Ford

David A. Ford is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Health, General Health Professions, Emergency Medical Services and Gender Studies, having authored 17 papers that have together received 325 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (4 papers), Intimate Partner and Family Violence (4 papers), Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse (3 papers), Disaster Response and Management (2 papers), Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics (2 papers), Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (1 paper), Health Policy Implementation Science (1 paper) and Conservation Techniques and Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Health (212 citations), Gender Studies (97 citations), Sociology and Political Science (227 citations), Conservation (14 citations) and Clinical Psychology (53 citations). David A. Ford has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Jonathan Ashley‐Smith, Frederick M. Burkle, Matthew Morgan, Erin Smith, Cécile M. Bensimon, Kristine M. Gebbie, Natalie Ciccone, S. Beatty, Brennen Mills and Masakazu Kita. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Interpersonal Violence, Prehospital and Disaster Medicine, Journal of Marriage and the Family, Australasian Journal of Paramedicine and Law & Society Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact