Anson Shupe

2.5k citations
125 papers · 1.7k · h-index 24

Impact in

  • Health top 1%
    • Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
    • Intimate Partner and Family Violence
    • Religion and Society Interactions
    • Religion, Society, and Development

Papers in

Anson Shupe

114 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Anson Shupe
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
  • Health 424
  • Sociology and Political Science 1.1k
  • Philosophy 241
  • Religious studies 77
  • Gender Studies 129
Replace Roy Wallis with:
Roy Wallis United Kingdom
Kieran Flanagan United Kingdom
William H. Swatos United States
Richard D. Knudten United States
Phillip E. Hammond United States
Jeffrey K. Hadden United States
Martin E. Marty United States
David G. Bromley United States
Eileen Barker United Kingdom
Richard Machalek United States
Anson Shupe relative to Roy Wallis United Kingdom Roy Wallis's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Roy Wallis · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anson Shupe

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anson Shupe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anson Shupe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anson Shupe more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anson Shupe

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anson Shupe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anson Shupe. The network helps show where Anson Shupe may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anson Shupe, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anson Shupe Line = papers co-authored together Anson Shupe links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 125 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1992156
2 198469
3 199468
4 199552
5 198851
6 197947
7 199646
8 199245
9 198944
10 198342
11 199538
12 198738
13 201236
14 198933
15 198131
16 197730
17 199530
18
The Violent Couple
199429
19 198528
20 199425

About Anson Shupe

Anson Shupe is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, Philosophy, History and Health, having authored 125 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Religion and Society Interactions (37 papers), Religion, Society, and Development (23 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (18 papers), Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices (12 papers), Mormonism, Religion, and History (10 papers), Religious Tourism and Spaces (8 papers), Media, Religion, Digital Communication (8 papers) and Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (424 citations), Sociology and Political Science (1.1k citations), Philosophy (241 citations), Religious studies (77 citations) and Gender Studies (129 citations). Anson Shupe has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include David G. Bromley, Joel Best, Jeffrey K. Hadden, R. Scott Appleby, James T. Richardson, Thomas Robbins, Martin E. Marty, Kersti Yllö, Thomas G. Alexander and Steve Bruce. Their work appears in journals such as Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, Review of Religious Research, Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews, Social Forces and Sociology of Religion.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact