Deborah Spence

16 papers receiving 349 citations

Peers

Deborah Spence
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
  • Research and Theory 46
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 8
  • Clinical Psychology 76
  • General Health Professions 84
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 15
Replace Şengül Yaman Sözbir with:
Şengül Yaman Sözbir Türkiye
Jennieffer Barr Australia
Mary K. Kirkpatrick United States
Natalie Wray Australia
Marcia Hills Canada
Barbara Love Canada
Dev Jootun United Kingdom
Karren Kowalski United States
Marie Alderson Canada
Kathryn Weaver Canada
Deborah Spence relative to Şengül Yaman Sözbir Türkiye Şengül Yaman Sözbir's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Şengül Yaman Sözbir · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Deborah Spence

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Deborah Spence's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Deborah Spence with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Deborah Spence more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Deborah Spence

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Deborah Spence. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Deborah Spence. The network helps show where Deborah Spence may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 12 scholars most cited alongside Deborah Spence, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Deborah Spence Line = papers co-authored together Deborah Spence links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 2007130
2 201243
3 200141
4 201938
5 200135
6 201634
7 200718
8 199415
9 201211
10 201811
11
Preparing registered nurses depends on "us and us and all of us".
201211
12 20233
13 20083
14 20231
15 20171
16 20181

About Deborah Spence

Deborah Spence is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Research and Theory, Sociology and Political Science, Philosophy and Education, having authored 16 papers that have together received 396 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nursing education and management (5 papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (4 papers), Cultural Competency in Health Care (3 papers), Hermeneutics and Narrative Identity (2 papers), Nursing Education, Practice, and Leadership (2 papers), Qualitative Research Methods and Applications (2 papers), Management and Organizational Studies (2 papers) and Mental Health and Psychiatry (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (46 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (8 citations), Clinical Psychology (76 citations), General Health Professions (84 citations) and Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (15 citations). Deborah Spence has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Elizabeth Smythe, Pamela M. Ironside, Melinda M. Swenson, Sharon L. Sims, Judy Mannix, Debra Jackson, Stephen Neville, Marion Hunter, Cathleen Aspinall and Catherine Cook. Their work appears in journals such as Nursing Inquiry, Contemporary Nurse, Journal of Advanced Nursing, Midwifery and International Journal of Nursing Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact