Danielle Spencer

702 citations
16 papers · 351 · h-index 5

Impact in

Papers in

Danielle Spencer

14 papers receiving 308 citations

Peers

Danielle Spencer
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 170
  • Family Practice 17
  • Health Information Management 35
  • Philosophy 44
  • General Health Professions 65
Replace Maura Spiegel with:
Maura Spiegel United States
Nellie Hermann United States
Subodh Dave United Kingdom
Ana Paula Salgueira Portugal
Jago Morrison United Kingdom
Franziska Kühne Germany
Amy Ramsay United Kingdom
Jennifer J. Torr Australia
Cheryl C. Munday United States
Kendra Beitz United States
Danielle Spencer relative to Maura Spiegel United States Maura Spiegel's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Maura Spiegel · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Danielle Spencer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Danielle Spencer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Danielle Spencer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Danielle Spencer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Danielle Spencer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Danielle Spencer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Danielle Spencer. The network helps show where Danielle Spencer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 9 scholars most cited alongside Danielle Spencer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Danielle Spencer Line = papers co-authored together Danielle Spencer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 2016291
2 200212
3 20168
4 20177
5
Metagnosis: Revelatory Narratives of Health and Identity
20206
6 20225
7 20204
8 20164
9 20163
10 20152
11 20232
12 20162
13 20192
14 20161
15 20211
16 20191

About Danielle Spencer

Danielle Spencer is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Philosophy, Clinical Psychology, Literature and Literary Theory and Health Information Management, having authored 16 papers that have together received 351 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Empathy and Medical Education (10 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (2 papers), Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics (1 paper), Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (1 paper), Historical Psychiatry and Medical Practices (1 paper), Child Abuse and Related Trauma (1 paper), Science Education and Perceptions (1 paper) and Hermeneutics and Narrative Identity (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (170 citations), Family Practice (17 citations), Health Information Management (35 citations), Philosophy (44 citations) and General Health Professions (65 citations). Danielle Spencer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Maura Spiegel, Craig Irvine, Nellie Hermann, Eric R. Marcus, Rita Charon, Sayantani DasGupta, Neeraj Mukesh Shah, Hannah J Mitchell and Kelly Morris. Their work appears in journals such as Literature and medicine, The Lancet, Physiotherapy Research International, Journal of Medical Humanities and Accident and Emergency Nursing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact