Danielle McFeeters

916 citations
19 papers · 671 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Danielle McFeeters

18 papers receiving 647 citations

Peers

Danielle McFeeters
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • Clinical Psychology 434
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 90
  • Occupational Therapy 18
  • General Health Professions 60
  • Health 16
Replace David Boyda with:
David Boyda United Kingdom
Panagiota Goulia Greece
Valeria Bianchini Italy
Rümeysa Yeni Elbay Türkiye
Agata Benfante Italy
Yi‐Jen Su Taiwan
Elizabeth Barrett Ireland
Roberto Mediavilla Spain
David Aceituno Chile
Jingwu Ge China
Danielle McFeeters relative to David Boyda United Kingdom David Boyda's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
David Boyda · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Danielle McFeeters

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Danielle McFeeters's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Danielle McFeeters with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Danielle McFeeters more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Danielle McFeeters

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Danielle McFeeters. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Danielle McFeeters. The network helps show where Danielle McFeeters may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Danielle McFeeters, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Danielle McFeeters Line = papers co-authored together Danielle McFeeters links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 2020222
2 2018142
3 201957
4 201443
5 201442
6 201834
7 201533
8 202026
9 201519
10 201516
11 202014
12 20177
13 20205
14 20173
15 20213
16 20253
17
Employment correlates of mental health in Northern Ireland
20121
18
Death by Suicide: A Report Based on the Northern Ireland Coroner’s Database
20151
19 20250

About Danielle McFeeters

Danielle McFeeters is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Social Psychology, General Health Professions and Applied Psychology, having authored 19 papers that have together received 671 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (9 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (3 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (2 papers), Sleep and related disorders (1 paper), Stress and Burnout Research (1 paper), Workplace Health and Well-being (1 paper), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (1 paper) and Mental Health Treatment and Access (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (434 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (90 citations), Occupational Therapy (18 citations), General Health Professions (60 citations) and Health (16 citations). Danielle McFeeters has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, China and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include David Boyda, Niall D. Galbraith, Tariq Hassan, Yuhui Wan, Ruoling Chen, Siobhan M. O’Neill, Ying Sun, Fangbiao Tao, Jiahu Hao and Shuangshuang Ma. Their work appears in journals such as Psychiatry Research, Journal of Alzheimer s Disease, Journal of Rural Studies, Psychology Health & Medicine and Frontiers in Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact