Michael L. Thomas

137 papers receiving 3.2k citations

Peers

Michael L. Thomas
Comparison fields: 5 of 166
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 162
  • Applied Psychology 177
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 447
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 574
  • Clinical Psychology 582
Replace Nicholas R. Eaton with:
Nicholas R. Eaton United States
Tobias Kaufmann Norway
Frederick L. Coolidge United States
Xiangfei Meng China
Margaret Drake United States
Paul B. Badcock Australia
Tobias Großmann Germany
Jeffrey H. Boyd United States
Larry R. Price United States
Pascal Antoine France
Michael L. Thomas relative to Nicholas R. Eaton United States Nicholas R. Eaton's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.7×
Nicholas R. Eaton · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael L. Thomas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael L. Thomas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael L. Thomas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael L. Thomas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael L. Thomas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael L. Thomas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael L. Thomas. The network helps show where Michael L. Thomas may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael L. Thomas, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael L. Thomas Line = papers co-authored together Michael L. Thomas links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 148 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010229
2 2004176
3 2016143
4 2021136
5 2015111
6 2020101
7 199992
8 201777
9 202176
10 201573
11 202172
12 199970
13 199960
14 201757
15 199756
16 202356
17 201955
18 202053
19 201150
20 201747

About Michael L. Thomas

Michael L. Thomas is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health and Social Psychology, having authored 148 papers that have together received 3.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroscience and Music Perception (16 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (13 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (11 papers), Cognitive Abilities and Testing (10 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury Research (10 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (10 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (9 papers) and Planetary Science and Exploration (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (162 citations), Applied Psychology (177 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (447 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (574 citations) and Clinical Psychology (582 citations). Michael L. Thomas has collaborated with scholars based in United States, France and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Dilip V. Jeste, Gregory A. Light, Yash B. Joshi, Neal R. Swerdlow, R. Carminati, J. Ricardo Arias‐Gonzalez, Jean‐Jacques Greffet, Barton W. Palmer, Juan L. Molina and Kai MacDonald. Their work appears in journals such as Schizophrenia Research, Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, Schizophrenia Bulletin, Psychological Assessment and Journal of Psychiatric Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact