Danielle D’Lima

604 citations
18 papers · 293 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Danielle D’Lima

14 papers receiving 285 citations

Peers

Danielle D’Lima
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
  • Emergency Medical Services 34
  • Pharmacy 19
  • General Health Professions 86
  • Clinical Psychology 59
  • Health Informatics 3
Replace Ilvana Lima Verde Gomes with:
Ilvana Lima Verde Gomes Brazil
Ailsa Donnelly United Kingdom
Carolina Watson Spain
Barbara Krainovich‐Miller United States
Joshua Proulx United States
Melissa Orlandi Honório Locks Brazil
Seung Gyeong Jang South Korea
Brandi Leach United Kingdom
Sue Bookey‐Bassett Canada
Lindsey Pope United Kingdom
Danielle D’Lima relative to Ilvana Lima Verde Gomes Brazil Ilvana Lima Verde Gomes's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×5.9×
Ilvana Lima Verde Gomes · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Danielle D’Lima

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Danielle D’Lima's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Danielle D’Lima with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Danielle D’Lima more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Danielle D’Lima

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Danielle D’Lima. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Danielle D’Lima. The network helps show where Danielle D’Lima may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Danielle D’Lima, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Danielle D’Lima Line = papers co-authored together Danielle D’Lima links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 202091
2 201990
3 201745
4 201922
5 201611
6 20227
7 20226
8 20206
9 20235
10 20233
11 20253
12 20231
13 20241
14 20021
15 20201
16 20230
17 20250
18 20250

About Danielle D’Lima

Danielle D’Lima is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology, Pharmacy, Emergency Medicine and Pharmacology, having authored 18 papers that have together received 293 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Health Policy Implementation Science (3 papers), Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (2 papers), Hospital Admissions and Outcomes (2 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (1 paper), Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (1 paper), Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact (1 paper), Environmental Education and Sustainability (1 paper) and Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Emergency Medical Services (34 citations), Pharmacy (19 citations), General Health Professions (86 citations), Clinical Psychology (59 citations) and Health Informatics (3 citations). Danielle D’Lima has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include Rachel Davis, Lindsay H. Dewa, Ara Darzi, Stephanie Archer, Sheila Adam, Hutan Ashrafian, Simon Turner, Naomi Fulop, Stephen Morris and Jessica Sheringham. Their work appears in journals such as Implementation Science, BMJ Open, Frontiers in Public Health, The Lancet and Systematic Reviews.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact