Danielle Barth

59 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Danielle Barth
Comparison fields: 5 of 103
  • Catalysis 165
  • Process Chemistry and Technology 66
  • Biochemistry 119
  • Spectroscopy 279
  • Biomedical Engineering 669
Replace R. Eggers with:
R. Eggers Germany
Akio Kodama Japan
Mamata Mukhopadhyay India
M. Perrut France
Esther Alonso Spain
Ki‐Pung Yoo South Korea
P.J. Cox United Kingdom
Pascale Subra France
Christelle Crampon France
Danielle Barth relative to R. Eggers Germany R. Eggers's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
R. Eggers · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Danielle Barth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Danielle Barth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Danielle Barth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Danielle Barth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Danielle Barth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Danielle Barth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Danielle Barth. The network helps show where Danielle Barth may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Danielle Barth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Danielle Barth Line = papers co-authored together Danielle Barth links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 64 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199294
2 198489
3 198675
4 198872
5 201669
6 200060
7 200153
8 199448
9 201546
10 199544
11 201141
12 201340
13 201339
14 201238
15 200437
16 199335
17 201735
18 199632
19 201230
20 202030

About Danielle Barth

Danielle Barth is a scholar working on Biomedical Engineering, Spectroscopy, Mechanical Engineering, Molecular Biology and Food Science, having authored 64 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Phase Equilibria and Thermodynamics (30 papers), Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies (11 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (9 papers), Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity (9 papers), Membrane Separation and Gas Transport (7 papers), Carbon dioxide utilization in catalysis (6 papers), Chemical Thermodynamics and Molecular Structure (6 papers) and Ionic liquids properties and applications (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Catalysis (165 citations), Process Chemistry and Technology (66 citations), Biochemistry (119 citations), Spectroscopy (279 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (669 citations). Danielle Barth has collaborated with scholars based in France, Tunisia and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include M. Perrut, J.‐J. DELPUECH, C. Tondre, Ernesto Reverchon, Giovanna Della Porta, Jean‐Noël Jaubert, C. Corbier, Guy Branlant, Laurent Perrin and Brigitte Jamart‐Grégoire. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Supercritical Fluids, Polymer, Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, Journal of Chromatography A and International Journal of Chemical Kinetics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact