Daniela Rapetti

15 papers receiving 670 citations

Peers

Daniela Rapetti
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 463
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 277
  • Physiology 267
  • Gastroenterology 27
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 80
Replace V. Margaret Jackson with:
V. Margaret Jackson United States
Norma Lattuada Italy
Thi Ai Diep Denmark
Ellis C. Gayles United States
Miwa Nahata Japan
Renata Padilha Guedes Brazil
Glynis E. Leighton United Kingdom
Lian-Bi Chen China
Matthew Arbuckle United States
William C. Valinsky Canada
Daniela Rapetti relative to V. Margaret Jackson United States V. Margaret Jackson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.4×
V. Margaret Jackson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniela Rapetti

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniela Rapetti's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniela Rapetti with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniela Rapetti more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniela Rapetti

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniela Rapetti. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniela Rapetti. The network helps show where Daniela Rapetti may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniela Rapetti, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniela Rapetti Line = papers co-authored together Daniela Rapetti links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 2002181
2 2006123
3 200675
4 200974
5 200865
6 200645
7 200527
8 200517
9 201315
10 200015
11 200414
12 200214
13 200513
14 200713
15 200010

About Daniela Rapetti

Daniela Rapetti is a scholar working on Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, Nutrition and Dietetics, Physiology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Reproductive Medicine, having authored 15 papers that have together received 701 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Regulation of Appetite and Obesity (13 papers), Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (5 papers), Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (4 papers), Adipose Tissue and Metabolism (3 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (3 papers), Diet, Metabolism, and Disease (2 papers), Hypothalamic control of reproductive hormones (2 papers) and Diet and metabolism studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (463 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (277 citations), Physiology (267 citations), Gastroenterology (27 citations) and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (80 citations). Daniela Rapetti has collaborated with scholars based in Italy. Frequent co-authors include Vittorio Locatelli, Antonio Torsello, Carmela Netti, V. Sibilia, Francesca Pagani, Ilaria Bulgarelli, Elena Bresciani, Guido Rindi, FRANCESCA GUIDOBONO and Nicoletta Campanini. Their work appears in journals such as Peptides, Brain Research, Journal of Neuroendocrinology, British Journal of Pharmacology and European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact