Daniela Kloo

26 papers receiving 934 citations

Peers

Daniela Kloo
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 743
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 419
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 192
  • Social Psychology 232
  • Statistics and Probability 88
Replace Kristen E. Lyons with:
Kristen E. Lyons United States
Andrew Simpson United Kingdom
Janet J. Boseovski United States
Claudia Thoermer Germany
Sabina Pauen Germany
Lara L. Jones United States
Pascale Engel de Abreu Luxembourg
Constance Vissers Netherlands
Jill de Villiers United States
Sophie Jacques Canada
Daniela Kloo relative to Kristen E. Lyons United States Kristen E. Lyons's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Kristen E. Lyons · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniela Kloo

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniela Kloo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniela Kloo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniela Kloo more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniela Kloo

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniela Kloo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniela Kloo. The network helps show where Daniela Kloo may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside Daniela Kloo, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniela Kloo Line = papers co-authored together Daniela Kloo links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2002246
2 2003171
3 2004100
4 200777
5 201262
6 200844
7 201043
8 202034
9 200833
10 201928
11 200727
12 201725
13 201723
14 201021
15 202013
16 20209
17 20228
18
Theory of Mind and Executive Functions
20086
19 20145
20 20215

About Daniela Kloo

Daniela Kloo is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology and Education, having authored 26 papers that have together received 999 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child and Animal Learning Development (22 papers), Cognitive Abilities and Testing (6 papers), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (6 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (5 papers), Early Childhood Education and Development (5 papers), Memory Processes and Influences (4 papers), Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (4 papers) and Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (743 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (419 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (192 citations), Social Psychology (232 citations) and Statistics and Probability (88 citations). Daniela Kloo has collaborated with scholars based in Austria, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Josef Perner, Beate Sodian, Susanne Kristen, Markus Aichhorn, Christopher Osterhaus, Markus Paulus, Liane Kaufmann, Sunae Kim, Marc H. Bornstein and Diane L. Putnick. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of Developmental Psychology, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, Child Development, International Journal of Behavioral Development and Developmental Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact