Daniela Becker

975 citations
38 papers · 693 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Daniela Becker

36 papers receiving 659 citations

Peers

Daniela Becker
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
  • Applied Psychology 227
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 190
  • General Decision Sciences 25
  • Clinical Psychology 180
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 162
Replace Wolfgang A. Rauch with:
Wolfgang A. Rauch Germany
Hans Marien Netherlands
Catharine E. Fairbairn United States
Quanshan Long China
Raúl Berríos Chile
Jordane Boudesseul France
Elena Cañadas Spain
Jonathan E. Friedel United States
Giles W. Story United Kingdom
Corinna Martarelli Switzerland
Daniela Becker relative to Wolfgang A. Rauch Germany Wolfgang A. Rauch's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×5.6×
Wolfgang A. Rauch · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniela Becker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniela Becker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniela Becker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniela Becker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniela Becker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniela Becker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniela Becker. The network helps show where Daniela Becker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniela Becker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniela Becker Line = papers co-authored together Daniela Becker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2014130
2 201167
3 201263
4 202045
5 201545
6 202233
7 200732
8 202128
9 201424
10 201723
11 202022
12 202122
13 201819
14 202317
15 201816
16 201713
17 202313
18 201612
19 201811
20 19918

About Daniela Becker

Daniela Becker is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology, General Decision Sciences and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 38 papers that have together received 693 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Behavioral Health and Interventions (18 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (5 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (4 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (4 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (3 papers), Psychological and Temporal Perspectives Research (3 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (2 papers) and Eating Disorders and Behaviors (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (227 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (190 citations), General Decision Sciences (25 citations), Clinical Psychology (180 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (162 citations). Daniela Becker has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Rob W. Holland, Nils B. Jostmann, Reinout W. H. J. Wiers, Katharina Bernecker, Agneta H. Fischer, Lotte Veenstra, Michael Vliek, Mark Rotteveel, Marleen Gillebaart and Harm Veling. Their work appears in journals such as Social Psychological and Personality Science, Motivation and Emotion, Appetite, The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse and Addictive Behaviors.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact