Daniel Wodak
Impact in
- Philosophy top 5%
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory
-
- Philosophy and Theoretical Science
- Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
Papers in
-
- Free Will and Agency 7
- Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment 5
-
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory 7
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics 7
- Co-authors
- Marjorie Rhodes (1 shared paper)Sarah‐Jane Leslie (1 shared paper)Robin Dembroff (2 shared papers)Bart Streumer (2 shared papers)David Plunkett (2 shared papers)April H. Bailey (1 shared paper)Andrei Cimpian (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Philosophical Studies (3 papers)Analysis (2 papers)Australasian Journal of Philosophy (2 papers)Philosophy and Phenomenological Research (1 paper)Res Philosophica (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Daniel Wodak
20 papers receiving 127 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 38
- Philosophy 78
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 46
- Cognitive Neuroscience 55
- General Decision Sciences 3
- Language and Linguistics 16
Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Wodak
This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Wodak's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Wodak with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Wodak more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Wodak
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Wodak. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Wodak. The network helps show where Daniel Wodak may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 7 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Wodak, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2015 | 38 | |
| 2 | 2018 | 21 | |
| 3 | 2018 | 11 | |
| 4 | 2019 | 11 | |
| 5 | 2017 | 10 | |
| 6 | 2018 | 8 | |
| 7 | 2019 | 8 | |
| 8 | 2021 | 6 | |
| 9 | 2016 | 5 | |
| 10 | 2018 | 5 | |
| 11 | 2020 | 5 | |
| 12 | 2021 | 4 | |
| 13 | 2019 | 3 | |
| 14 | 2024 | 2 | |
| 15 | 2024 | 2 | |
| 16 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 17 | 2019 | 1 | |
| 18 | 2022 | 1 | |
| 19 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 20 | 2022 | 1 |
About Daniel Wodak
Daniel Wodak is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Philosophy, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Law and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 22 papers that have together received 144 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophical Ethics and Theory (7 papers), Free Will and Agency (7 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (7 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (5 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (5 papers), Law in Society and Culture (3 papers), Political Philosophy and Ethics (3 papers) and Legal principles and applications (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (78 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (46 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (55 citations), General Decision Sciences (3 citations) and Language and Linguistics (16 citations). Daniel Wodak has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Marjorie Rhodes, Sarah‐Jane Leslie, Robin Dembroff, Bart Streumer, David Plunkett, April H. Bailey and Andrei Cimpian. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophical Studies, Analysis, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research and Res Philosophica.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.