Daniel Wodak
Impact in
- Philosophy top 5%
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory
-
- Philosophy and Theoretical Science
Papers in
- Philosophy 11
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics 8
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory 8
-
- Free Will and Agency 8
- Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment 7
- Co-authors
- Sarah‐Jane Leslie (2 shared papers)Marjorie Rhodes (1 shared paper)Robin Dembroff (3 shared papers)Bart Streumer (2 shared papers)David Plunkett (2 shared papers)April Hope Bailey (1 shared paper)Garrett Cullity (1 shared paper)Andrei Cimpian (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Philosophical Studies (3 papers)Philosophy and Phenomenological Research (2 papers)Analysis (2 papers)Australasian Journal of Philosophy (2 papers)Legal Theory (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesNetherlandsAustralia
In The Last Decade
Daniel Wodak
25 papers receiving 167 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 38
- Philosophy 103
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 57
- Cognitive Neuroscience 69
- General Decision Sciences 4
- Language and Linguistics 22
Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Wodak
This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Wodak's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Wodak with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Wodak more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Wodak
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Wodak. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Wodak. The network helps show where Daniel Wodak may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 8 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Wodak, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2015 | 43 | |
| 2 | 2018 | 27 | |
| 3 | 2019 | 14 | |
| 4 | 2018 | 13 | |
| 5 | 2020 | 12 | |
| 6 | 2017 | 11 | |
| 7 | 2018 | 8 | |
| 8 | 2019 | 8 | |
| 9 | 2017 | 7 | |
| 10 | 2020 | 7 | |
| 11 | 2021 | 7 | |
| 12 | 2021 | 6 | |
| 13 | 2018 | 6 | |
| 14 | 2016 | 5 | |
| 15 | 2021 | 5 | |
| 16 | 2018 | 4 | |
| 17 | 2019 | 3 | |
| 18 | 2023 | 2 | |
| 19 | 2024 | 2 | |
| 20 | 2019 | 2 |
About Daniel Wodak
Daniel Wodak is a scholar working on Philosophy, Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Law and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 30 papers that have together received 202 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (8 papers), Free Will and Agency (8 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (8 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (7 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (5 papers), Political Philosophy and Ethics (5 papers), Law in Society and Culture (2 papers) and Legal principles and applications (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (103 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (57 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (69 citations), General Decision Sciences (4 citations) and Language and Linguistics (22 citations). Daniel Wodak has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Sarah‐Jane Leslie, Marjorie Rhodes, Robin Dembroff, Bart Streumer, David Plunkett, April Hope Bailey, Garrett Cullity and Andrei Cimpian. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophical Studies, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, Analysis, Australasian Journal of Philosophy and Legal Theory.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.